BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10623318)

  • 21. Development and implementation of a quality assurance program for mammography.
    de Paredes ES; Frazier AB; Hartwell GD; Strash AM; Scheer C; Smith DC; Barnette PA; Noel W; Kenneweg D
    Radiology; 1987 Apr; 163(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 3823463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality assurance in Trent Regional Health Authority's breast screening programme.
    Thornhill P
    Radiogr Today; 1990 Apr; 56(635):11-3. PubMed ID: 2363814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality improvement projects for value-based care in breast imaging.
    Sippo DA; Nagy P
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Dec; 11(12 Pt A):1189-90. PubMed ID: 25307675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
    Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Auditing your breast imaging practice: an evidence-based approach.
    Sickles EA
    Semin Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 42(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 17919523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The controversy of mammography screening.
    Kopans DB
    Adm Radiol; 1995 Jan; 14(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10141106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Follow-up of abnormal results in an urban community-based breast cancer screening program.
    Fillmore CM; Beekman SR; Farmer BJ; Gold ML
    WMJ; 2003; 102(5):46-7. PubMed ID: 14621931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality assurance audits of community screening mammography practices: availability of active follow-up for data collection and outcome assessment.
    Brown ML; Houn F
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):825-9. PubMed ID: 8092017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Low-cost screening mammography: results of 21,141 consecutive examinations in a community program.
    Lynde JL
    South Med J; 1993 Mar; 86(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 8451676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Breast cancer: generalised screening in France from now on].
    Séradour B
    Rev Prat; 2004 Apr; 54(8):830-6. PubMed ID: 15274453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Breast cancer screening recommendations: who will advocate for the patient?
    Bellin L; Kragel PJ
    South Med J; 2010 Apr; 103(4):281. PubMed ID: 20224479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Breast imaging flow models.
    Parikh JR
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Apr; 1(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 17411578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Recommendations of the French Society of Mammography and Breast Pathology on quality criteria in mass screening for breast cancer in France].
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1994 Oct; 89(10):510-1. PubMed ID: 7817080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Good reasons to implement quality assurance in nationwide breast cancer screening programs in Croatia and Serbia: results from a pilot study.
    Ciraj-Bjelac O; Faj D; Stimac D; Kosutic D; Arandjic D; Brkic H
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 19896314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research.
    Lee CI; Bassett LW; Lehman CD
    Radiology; 2012 Sep; 264(3):632-6. PubMed ID: 22919037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Current issues in mammographic breast cancer screening.
    Rickard MT
    Hosp Med; 1999 May; 60(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 10396406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Large-scale effort tests digital mammography's potential.
    Anderson LF
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Apr; 86(8):580-2. PubMed ID: 8145271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [European recommendations for quality assurance in the setting of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Report of pathologists of the working group "Breast Cancer Screening" of the European Union].
    Ann Pathol; 1996 Nov; 16(5):315-33. PubMed ID: 9004719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The politics of mammography.
    McLelland R; Pisano ED
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):235-41. PubMed ID: 1732930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lessons from the mammography wars.
    Gøtzsche PC
    N Engl J Med; 2010 Dec; 363(26):2569; author reply 2570. PubMed ID: 21175334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.