424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10623365)
1. Economic evaluation of the treatment of chronic wounds: hydroactive wound dressings in combination with enzymatic ointment versus gauze dressings in patients with pressure ulcer and venous leg ulcer in Germany.
Bergemann R; Lauterbach KW; Vanscheidt W; Neander KD; Engst R
Pharmacoeconomics; 1999 Oct; 16(4):367-77. PubMed ID: 10623365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost effectiveness of using carboxymethylcellulose dressing compared with gauze in the management of exuding venous leg ulcers in Germany and the USA.
Guest JF; Ruiz FJ; Mihai A; Lehman A
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Jan; 21(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 15881478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of an advanced wound dressing used in Iran.
Kordestani S; Shahrezaee M; Tahmasebi MN; Hajimahmodi H; Haji Ghasemali D; Abyaneh MS
J Wound Care; 2008 Jul; 17(7):323-7. PubMed ID: 18705234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Management of venous leg ulcer by French physicians, diversity and related costs: a prospective medicoeconomic observational study].
Lévy E; Lévy P
J Mal Vasc; 2001 Feb; 26(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 11240528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The cost-effectiveness of wound management protocols of care.
Harding K; Cutting K; Price P
Br J Nurs; 2000 Oct; 9(19 Suppl):S6, S8, S10 passim. PubMed ID: 12271239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cost-effectiveness study of leg ulcer treatment in primary care. Comparison of saline-gauze and hydrocolloid treatment in a prospective, randomized study.
Ohlsson P; Larsson K; Lindholm C; Möller M
Scand J Prim Health Care; 1994 Dec; 12(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 7863149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the efficacies of alginate, foam, hydrocolloid, hydrofiber, and hydrogel dressings in the management of diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining how to dress for success.
Saco M; Howe N; Nathoo R; Cherpelis B
Dermatol Online J; 2016 Aug; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 27617934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical experience with a calcium alginate dressing.
McMullen D
Dermatol Nurs; 1991 Aug; 3(4):216-9, 270. PubMed ID: 1831374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A cost and clinical effectiveness analysis among moist wound healing dressings versus traditional methods in home care patients with pressure ulcers.
Souliotis K; Kalemikerakis I; Saridi M; Papageorgiou M; Kalokerinou A
Wound Repair Regen; 2016 May; 24(3):596-601. PubMed ID: 27037729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of the effectiveness and cost of treatment with humid environment as compared to traditional cure. Clinical trial on primary care patients with venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers].
Capillas Pérez R; Cabré Aguilar V; Gil Colomé AM; Gaitano García A; Torra i Bou JE
Rev Enferm; 2000 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 10788945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Economics of pressure-ulcer care: review of the literature on modern versus traditional dressings.
San Miguel L; Torra i Bou JE; Verdú Soriano J
J Wound Care; 2007 Jan; 16(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 17334139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of wound management in France: pressure ulcers and venous leg ulcers.
Meaume S; Gemmen E
J Wound Care; 2002 Jun; 11(6):219-24. PubMed ID: 12096580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unexpected economics of ulcer care protocols.
Kerstein MD
South Med J; 2004 Feb; 97(2):135-6. PubMed ID: 14982260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The reality of routine practice: a pooled data analysis on chronic wounds treated with TLC-NOSF wound dressings.
Münter KC; Meaume S; Augustin M; Senet P; Kérihuel JC
J Wound Care; 2017 Feb; 26(Sup2):S4-S15. PubMed ID: 28182533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and economic benefit of enzymatic debridement of pressure ulcers compared to autolytic debridement with a hydrogel dressing.
Waycaster C; Milne CT
J Med Econ; 2013 Jul; 16(7):976-86. PubMed ID: 23701261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A budget impact analysis comparing a Hydrofiber® ; dressing to an alginate dressing in managing exuding venous leg ulcers in France.
Yan S; Colin X; Coudray-Omnès C; Guido-Morin P; Kommala DR
Int Wound J; 2014 Jun; 11(3):304-13. PubMed ID: 23020759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a silver-releasing hydroalginate dressing in chronic wounds with signs of local infection.
Meaume S; Vallet D; Morere MN; Téot L
J Wound Care; 2005 Oct; 14(9):411-9. PubMed ID: 16240620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of Different Topical Treatments in the Healing of Pressure Injuries: A Network Meta-analysis.
Furuya-Kanamori L; Walker RM; Gillespie BM; Clark J; Doi SAR; Thalib L
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2019 Apr; 20(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 30471948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
