These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10623365)

  • 21. [Economic aspects of the treatment of leg ulcers using classical methods and modern bandages].
    Pospísilová A
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1999 Jan; 138(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 10953431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cost-effective use of silver dressings for the treatment of hard-to-heal chronic venous leg ulcers.
    Jemec GB; Kerihuel JC; Ousey K; Lauemøller SL; Leaper DJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100582. PubMed ID: 24945381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Xakellis GC; Chrischilles EA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tissue viability. Calcium alginate: a dressing trial.
    Moody M
    Nurs Stand Spec Suppl; 1991 Sep; (13):3-6. PubMed ID: 1911033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Alginate dressings in surgery and wound management: Part 2.
    Thomas S
    J Wound Care; 2000 Mar; 9(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 11933292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Economic aspects of standardization of modern wound care].
    Hartmann M; Schulz D; Gundermann C; Norgauer J
    Hautarzt; 2007 Nov; 58(11):970-4. PubMed ID: 17618408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of cadexomer iodine paste in the treatment of venous leg ulcers compared with hydrocolloid dressing and paraffin gauze dressing. Cadexomer Iodine Study Group.
    Hansson C
    Int J Dermatol; 1998 May; 37(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 9620490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pressure ulcer management in home health care: efficacy and cost effectiveness of moisture vapor permeable dressing.
    Sebern MD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1986 Oct; 67(10):726-9. PubMed ID: 3533007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Alginate dressing and polyurethane film versus paraffin gauze in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a randomized controlled pilot study.
    Kaiser D; Hafner J; Mayer D; French LE; Läuchli S
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Feb; 26(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 23337646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Clinical study using activity-based costing to assess cost-effectiveness of a wound management system utilizing modern dressings in comparison with traditional wound care].
    Ohura T; Sanada H; Mino Y
    Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jan; 41(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 14999922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Leg ulcer treatment in hospital and primary care in Sweden: cost-effective care and quality of life.
    Lindholm C
    Adv Wound Care; 1995; 8(5):48, 50, 52. PubMed ID: 7582337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of absorbent dressings in the treatment of highly exuding VLUs.
    Panca M; Cutting K; Guest JF
    J Wound Care; 2013 Mar; 22(3):109-10, 112-8. PubMed ID: 23665729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Superabsorbent wound dressings versus foams dressings for the management of moderate-to-highly exuding venous leg ulcers in French settings: An early stage model-based economic evaluation.
    Veličković VM; Prieto PA; Krga M; Jorge AM
    J Tissue Viability; 2022 Aug; 31(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 35534319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Randomised controlled trial of the use of three dressing preparations in the management of chronic ulceration of the foot in diabetes.
    Jeffcoate WJ; Price PE; Phillips CJ; Game FL; Mudge E; Davies S; Amery CM; Edmonds ME; Gibby OM; Johnson AB; Jones GR; Masson E; Patmore JE; Price D; Rayman G; Harding KG
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Nov; 13(54):1-86, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 19922726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Early experience with a calcium alginate dressing.
    Tintle TE; Jeter KF
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1990; 28():74-81. PubMed ID: 2363804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of an alginate dressing for pressure ulcers.
    Fowler E; Papen JC
    Decubitus; 1991 Aug; 4(3):47-8, 50, 52 passim. PubMed ID: 1872977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.
    Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; van Hattem J
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18279292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cost-of-illness studies in chronic ulcers: a systematic review.
    Chan B; Cadarette S; Wodchis W; Wong J; Mittmann N; Krahn M
    J Wound Care; 2017 Apr; 26(sup4):S4-S14. PubMed ID: 28379102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dressings for venous leg ulcers: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Palfreyman S; Nelson EA; Michaels JA
    BMJ; 2007 Aug; 335(7613):244. PubMed ID: 17631512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A prospective randomised controlled trial and economic modelling of antimicrobial silver dressings versus non-adherent control dressings for venous leg ulcers: the VULCAN trial.
    Michaels JA; Campbell WB; King BM; Macintyre J; Palfreyman SJ; Shackley P; Stevenson MD
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Nov; 13(56):1-114, iii. PubMed ID: 19939335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.