BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10623994)

  • 1. Pattern recognition of pelvic masses by gray-scale ultrasound imaging: the contribution of Doppler ultrasound.
    Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 14(5):338-47. PubMed ID: 10623994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses.
    Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 14(4):273-83. PubMed ID: 10586480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis?
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Metzger U; Lécuru F; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 16526098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gray scale sonography, subjective evaluation of the color Doppler image and measurement of blood flow velocity for distinguishing benign and malignant tumors of suspected adnexal origin.
    Valentin L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1997 Mar; 72(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 9076424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses.
    Sokalska A; Timmerman D; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Jurkovic D; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 19685552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of 'pattern recognition' and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: a prospective cross validation.
    Valentin L; Hagen B; Tingulstad S; Eik-Nes S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 18(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 11778996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound help in discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian masses?
    Jokubkiene L; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 29(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 17201017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intravenous contrast ultrasound examination using contrast-tuned imaging (CnTI) and the contrast medium SonoVue for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid components.
    Testa AC; Timmerman D; Van Belle V; Fruscella E; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Ferrazzi E; Leone FP; Marret H; Tranquart F; Exacoustos C; Nazzaro G; Bokor D; Magri F; Van Huffel S; Ferrandina G; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):699-710. PubMed ID: 19924735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limited contribution of Doppler velocimetry to the differential diagnosis of extrauterine pelvic tumors.
    Valentin L; Sladkevicius P; Marsàl K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Mar; 83(3):425-33. PubMed ID: 8127537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Lerner score, Doppler ultrasound examination, and their combination for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 10775998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125.
    Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Jurkovic D; Neven P; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1706-14. PubMed ID: 18000221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
    Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Paladini D; Van Calster B; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound characteristics of different types of adnexal malignancies.
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Testa A; Lécuru F; Bernard JP; Paladini D; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 16386783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Role of pulsed color Doppler in the presurgical evaluation of pelvic masses].
    Salle B; Gaucherand P; Ecochard R; Rudigoz RC
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1995; 24(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 7622769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnosis of pelvic masses with transabdominal color Doppler, CA 125 and ultrasonography.
    Franchi M; Beretta P; Ghezzi F; Zanaboni F; Goddi A; Salvatore S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1995 Oct; 74(9):734-9. PubMed ID: 7572110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flow characteristics in benign and malignant gynecologic tumors using transvaginal color flow Doppler.
    Carter J; Saltzman A; Hartenbach E; Fowler J; Carson L; Twiggs LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan; 83(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 8272293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
    Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pelvic examination, tumor marker level, and gray-scale and Doppler sonography in the prediction of pelvic cancer.
    Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Groshen S; Morrow CP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 9083301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasound experience substantially impacts on diagnostic performance and confidence when adnexal masses are classified using pattern recognition.
    Van Holsbeke C; Daemen A; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Bourne T; Mesens T; Lannoo L; Boes AS; Joos A; Van De Vijver A; Roggen N; de Moor B; de Jonge E; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2010; 69(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 20016188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-time ultrasound vs. evaluation of static images in the preoperative assessment of adnexal masses.
    Van Holsbeke C; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Daemen A; De Moor B; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Nov; 32(6):828-31. PubMed ID: 18925606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.