195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10624767)
1. Use of peak flow variability and methacholine responsiveness in predicting changes from pre-test diagnosis of asthma.
Parameswaran K; Belda J; Sears MR
Eur Respir J; 1999 Dec; 14(6):1358-62. PubMed ID: 10624767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Airway responsiveness as a direct factor contributing to the dyspnoea perception in asthma.
Koh YI; Choi IS; Lim H
Respir Med; 2001 Jun; 95(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 11421503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The potential use of spirometry during methacholine challenge test in young children with respiratory symptoms.
Vilozni D; Livnat G; Dabbah H; Elias N; Hakim F; Bentur L
Pediatr Pulmonol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):720-7. PubMed ID: 19499592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Value of the peak expiratory flow in bronchodynamic tests.
Pino JM; García-Río F; Prados C; Alvarez-Sala R; Díaz S; Villasante C; Villamor J
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 1996; 24(2):54-7. PubMed ID: 8933890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The FEF25-75 and its decline as a predictor of methacholine responsiveness in children.
Drewek R; Garber E; Stanclik S; Simpson P; Nugent M; Gershan W
J Asthma; 2009 May; 46(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 19484673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The links between allergen skin test sensitivity, airway responsiveness and airway response to allergen.
Cockcroft DW; Davis BE; Boulet LP; Deschesnes F; Gauvreau GM; O'Byrne PM; Watson RM
Allergy; 2005 Jan; 60(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 15575931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between airway responsiveness and peak expiratory flow variability in subjects with allergic rhinitis.
Prieto L; Gutiérrez V; Bertó JM; Tornero C; Camps B; Pérez MJ
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1995 Sep; 75(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 7552931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Diagnostic value of peak flow variability in patients with suspected diagnosis of bronchial asthma in general practice].
Tilemann L; Gindner L; Meyer FJ; Laux G; Szecsenyi J; Schneider A
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Oct; 134(41):2053-8. PubMed ID: 19802765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing bronchial hyper-responsiveness: provocation or peak expiratory flow variability?
den Otter JJ; Reijnen GM; van den Bosch WJ; van Schayck CP; Molema J; van Weel C
Br J Gen Pract; 1997 Aug; 47(421):487-92. PubMed ID: 9302787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is FENO50 useful diagnostic tool in suspected asthma?
Schleich FN; Asandei R; Manise M; Sele J; Seidel L; Louis R
Int J Clin Pract; 2012 Feb; 66(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 22257040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methacholine responsiveness, respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function in aluminum potroom workers.
Kongerud J; Søyseth V
Eur Respir J; 1991 Feb; 4(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 2044731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnosing asthma in children: what is the role for methacholine bronchoprovocation testing?
Liem JJ; Kozyrskyj AL; Cockroft DW; Becker AB
Pediatr Pulmonol; 2008 May; 43(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 18383334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of lowering methacholine challenge test cutoff in children.
Mazi A; Lands LC
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2014 Oct; 113(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 25091717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methacholine challenge testing: improved patient comfort with a 2-tiered protocol.
Segel MJ; Rabinovich E; Schwarz Y; Ben-Dov I
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2013 Jun; 110(6):429-32. PubMed ID: 23706711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methacholine challenge test as an adjunctive investigative tool in patients with asthma-like symptoms: the Sabah experience.
Tie ST; Wong JL; Beniyamin A; Ho A; Kannan SK; Jamalul Azizi AR
Med J Malaysia; 2012 Apr; 67(2):204-6. PubMed ID: 22822644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Small-airway obstruction, dynamic hyperinflation, and gas trapping despite normal airway sensitivity to methacholine in adults with chronic cough.
Sood N; Turcotte SE; Wasilewski NV; Fisher T; Wall T; Fisher JT; Lougheed MD
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2019 Feb; 126(2):294-304. PubMed ID: 30236044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validated safety predictions of airway responses to house dust mite in asthma.
Ravensberg AJ; van Rensen EL; Grootendorst DC; de Kluijver J; Diamant Z; Ricciardolo FL; Sterk PJ
Clin Exp Allergy; 2007 Jan; 37(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 17210047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Occupational asthma: validity of monitoring of peak expiratory flow rates and non-allergic bronchial responsiveness as compared to specific inhalation challenge.
Perrin B; Lagier F; L'Archevêque J; Cartier A; Boulet LP; Côté J; Malo JL
Eur Respir J; 1992 Jan; 5(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 1577147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two standardized methods of methacholine inhalation challenge in young adults.
Siersted HC; Walker CM; O'Shaughnessy AD; Willan AR; Wiecek EM; Sears MR
Eur Respir J; 2000 Jan; 15(1):181-4. PubMed ID: 10678643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bronchial challenge, assessed with forced expiratory manoeuvres and airway impedance.
Broeders ME; Molema J; Hop WC; Folgering HT
Respir Med; 2005 Aug; 99(8):1046-52. PubMed ID: 15950147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
