These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10625867)

  • 1. Facilitating the work of a meta-analyst.
    Beck CT
    Res Nurs Health; 1999 Dec; 22(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 10625867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic review--a method for nursing research.
    Holopainen A; Hakulinen-Viitanen T; Tossavainen K
    Nurse Res; 2008; 16(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 19025107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The meta-analytic approach to research integration.
    Onyskiw JE
    Can J Nurs Res; 1996; 28(3):69-85. PubMed ID: 8997940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is meta-analysis clinically useful for perianesthesia nurses?
    Kleinbeck SV
    J Perianesth Nurs; 2001 Jun; 16(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 11395835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis techniques.
    Graney MJ; Engle VF
    J Gerontol Nurs; 1990 Sep; 16(9):16-9. PubMed ID: 2398226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
    Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review.
    Walsh D; Downe S
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Apr; 50(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 15788085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of meta-analysis in nursing fields: An exploration based on the JBI guidelines.
    Hou Y; Tian J; Zhang J; Yun R; Zhang Z; Chen KH; Zhang C; Wang B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177648. PubMed ID: 28542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Redressing the power and effect of significance. A new approach to an old problem: teaching statistics to nursing students.
    Taylor S; Muncer S
    Nurse Educ Today; 2000 Jul; 20(5):358-64. PubMed ID: 10895117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are Reviewers' Scores Influenced by Citations to Their Own Work? An Analysis of Submitted Manuscripts and Peer Reviewer Reports.
    Schriger DL; Kadera SP; von Elm E
    Ann Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 67(3):401-406.e6. PubMed ID: 26518378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Conducting a systematic review of the literature: a brief guide].
    Koop PM; Burgess-Pinto E
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 2003; 13(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 12754780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conducting a systematic literature review: a brief guide.
    Koop PM; Burgess-Pinto E
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 2002; 12(4):196-7. PubMed ID: 12518471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.
    Harris AH; Reeder R; Hyun JK
    J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Oct; 43(15):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19435635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues.
    Jones ML
    J Adv Nurs; 2004 Nov; 48(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 15488041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Secondary analysis: expanding survey research by faculty members.
    Moldanado SA
    Nurse Educ; 1991; 16(4):4-5, 15. PubMed ID: 1866096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews.
    Rethlefsen ML; Farrell AM; Osterhaus Trzasko LC; Brigham TJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):617-26. PubMed ID: 25766056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-corresponding authors in the era of meta-analyses.
    Manca A; Cugusi L; Dvir Z; Deriu F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 98():159-161. PubMed ID: 29408344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pervasive errors in hypothesis testing: Toward better statistical practice in nursing research.
    Staggs VS
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Oct; 98():87-93. PubMed ID: 31349121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.