115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10628036)
1. Digitized mammograms: a preliminary clinical evaluation and the potential for telemammography.
Murphy JM; O'Hare NJ; Wheat D; McCarthy PA; Dowling A; Hayes R; Bowmer H; Wilson GF; Molloy MP
J Telemed Telecare; 1999; 5(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 10628036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting clustered microcalcifications in the female breast: secondary digitized images versus mammograms.
De Maeseneer M; Beeckman P; Osteaux M; Mattheus R; Hoste M; Bastaerts Y; Jong B
J Belge Radiol; 1992 Jun; 75(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 1400145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Full-field digital mammographic interpretation with prior analog versus prior digitized analog mammography: time for interpretation.
Garg AS; Rapelyea JA; Rechtman LR; Torrente J; Bittner RB; Coffey CM; Brem RF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1436-8. PubMed ID: 21606310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic breast region extraction from digital mammograms for PACS and telemammography applications.
Lou SL; Lin HD; Lin KP; Hoogstrate D
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2000; 24(4):205-20. PubMed ID: 10842045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Authenticity and integrity of digital mammography images.
Zhou XQ; Huang HK; Lou SL
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Aug; 20(8):784-91. PubMed ID: 11513029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.
Pisano ED; Cole EB; Major S; Zong S; Hemminger BM; Muller KE; Johnston RE; Walsh R; Conant E; Fajardo LL; Feig SA; Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ; Williams MB; Aylward SR
Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30. PubMed ID: 10966717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography.
Penedo M; Pearlman WA; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 14552582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
Sheybani EO; Sankar R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnosis of breast calcifications: comparison of contact, magnified, and television-enhanced images.
Kimme-Smith C; Gold RH; Bassett LW; Gormley L; Morioka C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):963-7. PubMed ID: 2801445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improvement of sensitivity of breast cancer diagnosis with adaptive neighborhood contrast enhancement of mammograms.
Rangayyan RM; Shen L; Shen Y; Desautels JE; Bryant H; Terry TJ; Horeczko N; Rose MS
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 1997 Sep; 1(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 11020818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display.
Pisano ED; Cole EB; Kistner EO; Muller KE; Hemminger BM; Brown ML; Johnston RE; Kuzmiak CM; Braeuning MP; Freimanis RI; Soo MS; Baker JA; Walsh R
Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):483-8. PubMed ID: 11997557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic microcalcifications: detection with xerography, screen-film, and digitized film display.
Smathers RL; Bush E; Drace J; Stevens M; Sommer FG; Brown BW; Karras B
Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 3704149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multisite telemammography system for remote management of screening mammography: an assessment of technical, operational, and clinical issues.
Leader JK; Hakim CM; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Wallace LP; Clearfield RJ; Perrin RL; Drescher JM; Maitz GS; Sumkin JH; Gur D
J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 16710798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Film-screen versus digitized mammography: assessment of clinical equivalence.
Powell KA; Obuchowski NA; Chilcote WA; Barry MM; Ganobcik SN; Cardenosa G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Oct; 173(4):889-94. PubMed ID: 10511142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms.
Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson SK; Adler D; Nees AV; Shen J
Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):343-56. PubMed ID: 16801362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Niklason LT; Ikeda DM; Lam KL; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1994 Jul; 21(7):1203-11. PubMed ID: 7968855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preliminary clinical evaluation of a high-resolution telemammography system.
Maitz GS; Chang TS; Sumkin JH; Wintz PW; Johns CM; Ganott M; Holbert BL; Hakim CM; Harris KM; Gur D; Herron JM
Invest Radiol; 1997 Apr; 32(4):236-40. PubMed ID: 9101359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
