These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10628092)

  • 1. The complexity of obesity.
    Orbanic SD; Levi A; Hawkins JW; Driscoll JW; Biley FC; Kendall J; Griffin JK; Daisy C; Clemmens D; Klima C; Glass N; Matteson PS
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1999; 31(4):315. PubMed ID: 10628092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The complexity of obesity.
    Farren AT
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1999; 31(4):315. PubMed ID: 10628093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The complexity of obesity.
    Allan JD; Walker LO
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1999; 31(4):315-6. PubMed ID: 10628094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Popularity of evidence based nursing amongst practitioners.
    Pearson A
    Int J Nurs Pract; 1997 Dec; 3(4):205. PubMed ID: 9611529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating quantitative research problems.
    Finnick M; Haughey BP
    Crit Care Nurse; 1992 Jun; 12(5):98-105. PubMed ID: 1597067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research rituals.
    Reed J; Robbins I
    Nurs Times; 1991 Jun 5-11; 87(23):50-1. PubMed ID: 2047258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning to give and accept research critiques: some unique models.
    Ingram C
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 2000; 10(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 10887858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reviewing a manuscript for publication: how do I do this?
    Koop PP
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 10703301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grant reviews: how to do them well.
    Koop PM
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 10703294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A guide to evaluating hypotheses and definitions of variables.
    Haughey BP
    Crit Care Nurse; 1992 Dec; 12(8):98-103. PubMed ID: 1288958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critiquing research for use in practice.
    Dale JC
    J Pediatr Health Care; 2005; 19(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 15867836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sifting evidence.
    Renshaw M; Strachan H; Tomlinson D
    Nurs Times; 1999 Sep 22-28; 95(38):26-7. PubMed ID: 10734893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Between the lines.
    Traynor M; Rafferty AM; Solano D
    Nurs Stand; 2003 Dec 10-16; 18(13):16-7. PubMed ID: 14694867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AACN levels of evidence: what's new?
    Armola RR; Bourgault AM; Halm MA; Board RM; Bucher L; Harrington L; Heafey CA; Lee R; Shellner PK; Medina J
    Crit Care Nurse; 2009 Aug; 29(4):70-3. PubMed ID: 19648600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualitative research: where do nurses begin?
    Reisinger PB
    SCI Nurs; 2004; 21(3):162-3. PubMed ID: 15553061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 10 good questions for understanding nursing research.
    Learn CD
    Beginnings; 2002; 22(1):10, 15. PubMed ID: 11842640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The complexity of obesity.
    Amella EJ
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1999; 31(4):316. PubMed ID: 10628095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Negotiating the methods debate: context is the real issue.
    O'Connell B
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 1997; 15(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 9348767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critical appraisal. How to decide if review articles are trustworthy and relevant for practice.
    Cullum N
    NT Learn Curve; 1999 Aug; 3(6):4-6. PubMed ID: 10795232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward a new paradigm for nursing.
    Billingsley M
    Nursingconnections; 1992; 5(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 1293514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.