These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1062938)

  • 1. An evaluation of extraoral combined high-pull traction and cervical traction to the maxilla.
    Badell MC
    Am J Orthod; 1976 Apr; 69(4):431-46. PubMed ID: 1062938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cephalometric evaluation of high-pull molar headgear and face-bow neck strap therapy.
    Brown P
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Dec; 74(6):621-32. PubMed ID: 281872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Caldwell SF; Hymas TA; Timm TA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):376-84. PubMed ID: 6586076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative analysis of the orthodontic and orthopedic effects of maxillary traction.
    Baumrind S; Korn EL; Isaacson RJ; West EE; Molthen R
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Nov; 84(5):384-98. PubMed ID: 6579840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dentofacial changes produced by extraoral forward force in the Macaca irus.
    Kambara T
    Am J Orthod; 1977 Mar; 71(3):249-77. PubMed ID: 402814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: a randomized controlled trial.
    Bondemark L; Karlsson I
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 16279817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement.
    Brickman CD; Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 11094366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A growth-related concept for skeletal class II treatment.
    Teuscher U
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Sep; 74(3):258-75. PubMed ID: 281130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental and postexperimental response to anteriorly directed extraoral force in young Macaca nemestrina.
    Jackson GW; Kokich VG; Shapiro PA
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Mar; 75(3):318-33. PubMed ID: 107808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molar changes with cervical headgear alone or in combination with rapid maxillary expansion.
    Marchiori Farret M; de Lima EM; Pereira Araújo V; Deon Rizzatto SM; Macedo de Menezes L; Lima Grossi M
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):847-51. PubMed ID: 18298206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of cervical anchorage during and after treatment: an implant study.
    Melsen B
    Am J Orthod; 1978 May; 73(5):526-40. PubMed ID: 277067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skeletal changes associated with extraoral appliance therapy: an evaluation of 200 consecutively treated cases.
    Boecler PR; Riolo ML; Keeling SD; TenHave TR
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 2596748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The maxillary orthopedic splint.
    Joffe L; Jacobson A
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Jan; 75(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 283694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of cervical headgear and fixed appliances on the space available for maxillary second molars.
    Piva LM; Brito HH; Leite HR; O'Reilly M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 16168333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Firouz M; Zernik J; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Sep; 102(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 1510043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Upper headgear versus lower headgear, yokes, and class III elastics.
    Osvaldik-Trapl M; Droschl H
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 272132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative analysis of maxillary tooth movement produced by cervical headgear and pend-x appliance.
    Taner TU; Yukay F; Pehlivanoglu M; Cakirer B
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):686-91. PubMed ID: 14719733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Holographic and cephalometric study of the relationship between craniofacial morphology and the initial reactions to high-pull headgear traction.
    Duterloo HS; Kragt G; Algra AM
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 3863488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.