These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10629515)

  • 1. The effect of enamel air abrasion on the retention of bonded metallic orthodontic brackets.
    Canay S; Kocadereli I; Ak"ca E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 10629515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of shear bond strength and surface structure between conventional acid etching and air-abrasion of human enamel.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Damon P; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):502-6. PubMed ID: 9387836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A laboratory investigation to compare enamel preparation by sandblasting or acid etching prior to bracket bonding.
    Sargison AE; McCabe JF; Millett DT
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 26(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 10420249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface.
    Suma S; Anita G; Chandra Shekar BR; Kallury A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 22945715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The air-abrasion technique versus the conventional acid-etching technique: A quantification of surface enamel loss and a comparison of shear bond strength.
    van Waveren Hogervorst WL; Feilzer AJ; Prahl-Andersen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 10629516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface and interfacial analysis of sandblasted and acid-etched enamel for bonding orthodontic adhesives.
    Patcas R; Zinelis S; Eliades G; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S64-75. PubMed ID: 25836346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.
    Scougall Vilchis RJ; Yamamoto S; Kitai N; Yamamoto K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19732677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of lingual enamel sandblasting with aluminum oxide of different particle sizes in combination with phosphoric acid etching on indirect bonding of lingual brackets.
    Robles-Ruíz JJ; Ciamponi AL; Medeiros IS; Kanashiro LK
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1068-73. PubMed ID: 24813325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of shear bond strength with different enamel pre-treatments.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Al-Wahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Apr; 26(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 15130041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enamel preparation for orthodontic bonding: a comparison between the use of a sandblaster and current techniques.
    Reisner KR; Levitt HL; Mante F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Apr; 111(4):366-73. PubMed ID: 9109581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bonding with self-etching primers--pumice or pre-etch? An in vitro study.
    Fitzgerald I; Bradley GT; Bosio JA; Hefti AF; Berzins DW
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):257-61. PubMed ID: 21300729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of sandblasting on the bond strength of the bondable molar tube bracket.
    Chung K; Hsu B; Berry T; Hsieh T
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 May; 28(5):418-24. PubMed ID: 11380781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Martin S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8611486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement].
    Sorel O; el Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
    Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro investigation of a comparison of bond strengths of composite to etched and air-abraded human enamel surfaces.
    Gray GB; Carey GP; Jagger DC
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16433645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases.
    MacColl GA; Rossouw PE; Titley KC; Yamin C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Mar; 113(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 9517718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of altering the type of enamel conditioner on the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer adhesive.
    Bishara SE; Vonwald L; Laffoon JF; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 10982929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.