240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10629519)
1. Comparison of Jones jig molar distalization appliance with extraoral traction.
Haydar S; Uner O
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 10629519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative distalization effects of Jones jig and pendulum appliances.
Patel MP; Janson G; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; de Freitas KM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 19268832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skeletal and dental effects of molar distalization using a modified palatal anchorage plate in adolescents.
Sa'aed NL; Park CO; Bayome M; Park JH; Kim Y; Kook YA
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):657-64. PubMed ID: 25191840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization.
Kinzinger GS; Gülden N; Yildizhan F; Diedrich PR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):578-86. PubMed ID: 19815162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative cephalometric study of Class II malocclusion treatment with Pendulum and Jones jig appliances followed by fixed corrective orthodontics.
Patel MP; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Janson G; de Freitas MR
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):58-64. PubMed ID: 24351151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes with the cervical headgear and Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.
Fontes FPH; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del-Castillo A; Patel MP; Freitas MR; Henriques JFC; Janson G
Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):424-435. PubMed ID: 32278665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noncompliance therapy: Veltri appliance.
Doğan K; Başaran Ğ; Hamamci N; Hamamci O
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):e1-6. PubMed ID: 19639094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer.
Keles A; Sayinsu K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 10629518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects.
Mariani L; Maino G; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):43. PubMed ID: 25138818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement.
Brickman CD; Sinha PK; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 11094366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonextraction treatment of a high-angle class II malocclusion: a case report.
Giancotti A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):721-7. PubMed ID: 10842116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment effects of a modified palatal anchorage plate for distalization evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
Kook YA; Bayome M; Trang VT; Kim HJ; Park JH; Kim KB; Behrents RG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 24974998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary unilateral molar distalization with sliding mechanics: a preliminary investigation.
Keles A
Eur J Orthod; 2001 Oct; 23(5):507-15. PubMed ID: 11668870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.
Caprioglio A; Cozzani M; Fontana M
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):49. PubMed ID: 25139288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
Kircelli BH; Pektaş ZO; Kircelli C
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):650-9. PubMed ID: 16808573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
