These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10629824)

  • 1. Examination of more frequent genetic evaluations for dairy bulls.
    Powell RL; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Dec; 82(12):2766-70. PubMed ID: 10629824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heritability of changes in genetic evaluations of dairy bulls from first to later records of daughters.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Apr; 85(4):951-7. PubMed ID: 12018441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of predicting genetic merit from pedigree information for bulls entering stud sampling programs.
    Samuelson DJ; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 Sep; 78(9):2057-66. PubMed ID: 8550915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of foreign dairy bull evaluations in predicting United States evaluations for yield.
    Powell RL; Sanders AH; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2621-6. PubMed ID: 15328287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationships of productive life evaluations with changes in evaluations for yields.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT; Tabbaa MJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Mar; 85(3):677-81. PubMed ID: 11949874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stability of genetic evaluations for active artificial insemination bulls.
    Powell RL; Sanders AH; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2614-20. PubMed ID: 15328286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and stability of national and international somatic cell score evaluations.
    Powell RL; Sanders AH; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jul; 88(7):2624-31. PubMed ID: 15956324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of maturity rate of daughters on genetic ranking of Holstein bulls.
    Norman HD; Wright JR; Powell RL; Vanraden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3337-45. PubMed ID: 16107424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genotype x environment interaction for grazing versus confinement. I. Production traits.
    Kearney JF; Schutz MM; Boettcher PJ; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Feb; 87(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 14762093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of most recent evaluations of Holstein bulls from first available pedigree information.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Mar; 85(3):670-6. PubMed ID: 11949873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alternatives for examining daughter performance of progeny-test bulls between official evaluations.
    Norman HD; Wright JR; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2348-55. PubMed ID: 19389993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of multinational data to improve national evaluations of Holstein bulls.
    Powell RL; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Aug; 81(8):2257-63. PubMed ID: 9749392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examination of international genetic evaluations of Holstein bulls.
    Powell RL; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Sep; 79(9):1659-65. PubMed ID: 8899534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictability of bull merit from genetic evaluations of sires and maternal grandsires using an animal model.
    Rekik B; Berger PJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 May; 80(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 9178137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of paternity errors in cow identification on genetic evaluations and international comparisons.
    Banos G; Wiggans GR; Powell RL
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Nov; 84(11):2523-9. PubMed ID: 11768094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Animal model evaluations for Mexican Holsteins.
    Powell RL; Wiggans GR
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Apr; 74(4):1420-7. PubMed ID: 1860983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of national and regional sire evaluations in predicting future-daughter milk yield.
    Norman HD; Vanraden PM; Powell RL; Wright JR; Verboort WR
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Feb; 88(2):812-26. PubMed ID: 15653549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors influencing international comparisons of dairy sires.
    Schaeffer LR; Reents R; Jamrozik J
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Jun; 79(6):1108-16. PubMed ID: 8827476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of linear type and production data to supplement early predicted transmitting abilities for productive life.
    Weigel KA; Lawlor TJ; Vanraden PM; Wiggans GR
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Jul; 81(7):2040-4. PubMed ID: 9710774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.