These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10630714)
1. The role of peer-reviewed journals in science. Weinberger M; Tierney WM; Ayanian JZ; Burnam A; Escarce JJ; Hays RD; Horner RD; McHorney CA; Oddone EZ; Romano P; Powe NR; Stearns SC Med Care; 2000 Jan; 38(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10630714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical journals and the science of peer review: raising the standard. Callaham ML; Waeckerle JF Ann Emerg Med; 1996 Jul; 28(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 8669742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An interview with the editors: by Daniel D. Moos. Hooper V; Odom-Forren J J Perianesth Nurs; 2010 Feb; 25(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 20159536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers. Lovejoy TI; Revenson TA; France CR Ann Behav Med; 2011 Aug; 42(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21505912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stewards of the discipline: The role of referees and peer review. Broome ME Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):169-70. PubMed ID: 20637926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Conceptual debates and empirical evidence about the peer review process for scholarly journals. Thomas SP J Prof Nurs; 2011; 27(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 21596357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Journal lays bare remarks from peer reviewers. Marris E Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7077):642. PubMed ID: 16467803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review and refereeing in science. Lore W East Afr Med J; 1995 May; 72(5):335-7. PubMed ID: 7555893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review. Scarfe WC Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal. Duff K; O'Bryant SE; Westervelt HJ; Sweet JJ; Reynolds CR; van Gorp WG; Tranel D; McCaffrey RJ Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 24(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 19640873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical science and the science of practice: Critical Care Medicine, 2015. Buchman TG Crit Care Med; 2015 Feb; 43(2):259-60. PubMed ID: 25599462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Why are people reluctant to join in open review? Liu SV Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1052. PubMed ID: 17597736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Considerations in presenting, interpreting, and reviewing research findings. Niemcryk SJ; Glascoff DW J Transpl Coord; 1997 Mar; 7(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 9188398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What is in store for 2004? Rapid review will mean cutting edge information to you! Kelley LS J Gerontol Nurs; 2003 Dec; 29(12):5. PubMed ID: 14692237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process. Giles J Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part I. Defining the review. Levine AM; Heckman JD; Hensinger RN Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():679-88. PubMed ID: 15116658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]