These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10631068)

  • 1. Framing the Game: Examining Frame Choice in Bargaining.
    Blount S; Larrick RP
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Jan; 81(1):43-71. PubMed ID: 10631068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empathy leads to fairness.
    Page KM; Nowak MA
    Bull Math Biol; 2002 Nov; 64(6):1101-16. PubMed ID: 12508533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3-D negotiation. Playing the whole game.
    Lax DA; Sebenius JK
    Harv Bus Rev; 2003 Nov; 81(11):64-74, 138. PubMed ID: 14619152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effects of Framing, Reflection, Probability, and Payoff on Risk Preference in Choice Tasks.
    Kühberger A; Schulte-Mecklenbeck M; Perner J
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Jun; 78(3):204-231. PubMed ID: 10343064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attribute Framing and Goal Framing Effects in Health Decisions.
    Krishnamurthy P; Carter P; Blair E
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2001 Jul; 85(2):382-399. PubMed ID: 11461207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serum omega-3 fatty acids are associated with ultimatum bargaining behavior.
    Emanuele E; Brondino N; Re S; Bertona M; Geroldi D
    Physiol Behav; 2009 Jan; 96(1):180-3. PubMed ID: 18940191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regulatory focus at the bargaining table: promoting distributive and integrative success.
    Galinsky AD; Leonardelli GJ; Okhuysen GA; Mussweiler T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1087-98. PubMed ID: 16000269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Role of Inferences in Sequential Bargaining with One-Sided Incomplete Information: Some Experimental Evidence.
    Srivastava J
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2001 May; 85(1):166-187. PubMed ID: 11341821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Influence of Physical Attractiveness and Gender on Ultimatum Game Decisions.
    Solnick SJ; Schweitzer ME
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Sep; 79(3):199-215. PubMed ID: 10471361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short- and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior.
    Espín AM; Exadaktylos F; Herrmann B; Brañas-Garza P
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():214. PubMed ID: 26347625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gain-Loss Framing and Choice: Separating Outcome Formulations from Descriptor Formulations.
    Mandel DR
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2001 May; 85(1):56-76. PubMed ID: 11341817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Negotiator Risk: Sources of Uncertainty and the Impact of Reference Points on Negotiated Agreements.
    Bottom WP
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1998 Nov; 76(2):89-112. PubMed ID: 9831517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game.
    Rand DG; Tarnita CE; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Feb; 110(7):2581-6. PubMed ID: 23341593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game.
    Jensen K; Call J; Tomasello M
    Science; 2007 Oct; 318(5847):107-9. PubMed ID: 17916736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical fluctuations in population bargaining in the ultimatum game: static and evolutionary aspects.
    da Silva R; Kellermann GA; Lamb LC
    J Theor Biol; 2009 May; 258(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 19490871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deception and Retribution in Repeated Ultimatum Bargaining.
    Boles TL; Croson RT; Murnighan JK
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Nov; 83(2):235-259. PubMed ID: 11056070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A social functional approach to emotions in bargaining: when communicating anger pays and when it backfires.
    van Dijk E; van Kleef GA; Steinel W; van Beest I
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):600-14. PubMed ID: 18361674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working Together but in Opposition: An Examination of the "Good-Cop/Bad-Cop" Negotiating Team Tactic.
    Brodt SE; Tuchinsky M
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Mar; 81(2):155-177. PubMed ID: 10706812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emotions and cooperation in economic games.
    Haselhuhn MP; Mellers BA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 23(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 15795131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alternating-Offers Bargaining with Nash Bargaining Fairness Concerns.
    Feng Z; Li F; Tan C
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36829353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.