216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10631418)
1. A comparison of the reinforced and standard laryngeal mask airway: ease of insertion and the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure.
Buckham M; Brooker M; Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anaesth Intensive Care; 1999 Dec; 27(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 10631418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12553391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the flexible and standard laryngeal mask airways.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Can J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 46(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 10391603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized comparison of the Baska FESS mask and the LMA Supreme in different head and neck positions.
Foo LL; Shariffuddin II; Chaw SH; Lee PK; Lee CE; Chen YS; Chan L
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2018 Aug; 15(8):597-603. PubMed ID: 30095289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA Protector and LMA-ProSeal in different head and neck positions in anaesthetized and paralyzed patients; A prospective randomized study.
Kerai S; Bhatt G; Saxena KN; Gaba P; Wadhwa B
Indian J Anaesth; 2023 Feb; 67(2):201-206. PubMed ID: 37091441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pressures exerted against the cervical vertebrae by the standard and intubating laryngeal mask airways: a randomized, controlled, cross-over study in fresh cadavers.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Keller K
Anesth Analg; 1999 Nov; 89(5):1296-300. PubMed ID: 10553855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Morris R; Mecklem D
Anesth Analg; 1998 Oct; 87(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 9768795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial.
Zhang L; Seet E; Mehta V; Subramanyam R; Ankichetty SP; Wong DT; Chung F
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Jul; 58(7):624-629. PubMed ID: 21533663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Br J Anaesth; 2000 Aug; 85(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 10992836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure.
Somri M; Vaida S; Garcia Fornari G; Mendoza GR; Charco-Mora P; Hawash N; Matter I; Swaid F; Gaitini L
BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):87. PubMed ID: 27716165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the reusable Classic laryngeal mask airway and the single-use Soft Seal laryngeal mask airway.
Hanning SJ; McCulloch TJ; Orr B; Anderson SP
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2006 Apr; 34(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 16617647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of mouth opening on oropharyngeal leak pressure, intracuff pressure, and cuff position with the laryngeal mask airway.
Sanuki T; Sugioka S; Hirokane M; Son H; Uda R; Akatsuka M; Kotani J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1038-42. PubMed ID: 20223572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mucosal pressures from the cuffed oropharyngeal airway vs the laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Br J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 82(6):922-4. PubMed ID: 10562790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The laryngeal mask airway Unique versus the Soft Seal laryngeal mask: a randomized, crossover study in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Brimacombe J; von Goedecke A; Keller C; Brimacombe L; Brimacombe M
Anesth Analg; 2004 Nov; 99(5):1560-1563. PubMed ID: 15502065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of head and neck position on the oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position of three supraglottic airway devices.
Park SH; Han SH; Do SH; Kim JW; Kim JH
Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 19095838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laryngeal mask airway size selection in males and females: ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, pharyngeal mucosal pressures and anatomical position.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Br J Anaesth; 1999 May; 82(5):703-7. PubMed ID: 10536546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.
Maitra S; Baidya DK; Arora MK; Bhattacharjee S; Khanna P
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesthesiology; 2000 Jul; 93(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 10861152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
