BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10632508)

  • 1. Ergonomics and design of laparoscopic instruments: results of a survey among laparoscopic surgeons.
    Van Veelen MA; Meijer DW
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 1999 Dec; 9(6):481-9. PubMed ID: 10632508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments.
    DesCôteaux JG; Blackmore K; Parsons L
    Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments.
    Berguer R
    Surg Endosc; 1998 May; 12(5):458-62. PubMed ID: 9569372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New ergonomic design criteria for handles of laparoscopic dissection forceps.
    van Veelen ; Meijer DW; Goossens RH; Snijders CJ
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2001 Feb; 11(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 11444319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender equity in surgical instruments: ergonomics of ring-handled forceps.
    Kono E; Nomura S; Sakamoto T; Okoshi K; Tanaka C; Shirabe K; Lee SW; Kitagawa Y
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2024 Feb; 33(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 37782336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis.
    DesCôteaux JG; Tye L; Poulin EC
    Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8769924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between hand size and difficulty using surgical instruments: a survey of 726 laparoscopic surgeons.
    Berguer R; Hreljac A
    Surg Endosc; 2004 Mar; 18(3):508-12. PubMed ID: 15100896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopy.
    Hemal AK; Srinivas M; Charles AR
    J Endourol; 2001 Jun; 15(5):499-503. PubMed ID: 11465329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survey on surgical instrument handle design: ergonomics and acceptance.
    Santos-Carreras L; Hagen M; Gassert R; Bleuler H
    Surg Innov; 2012 Mar; 19(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 21868419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instrument costs.
    Eddie G; White S
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1996 Oct; 66(10):671-5. PubMed ID: 8855921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ergonomics problems due to the use and design of dissector and needle holder: a survey in minimally invasive surgery.
    Lucas-Hernández M; Pagador JB; Pérez-Duarte FJ; Castelló P; Sánchez-Margallo FM
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2014 Oct; 24(5):e170-7. PubMed ID: 24710253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Instruments for minimally invasive surgery: principles of ergonomic handles.
    Matern U; Waller P
    Surg Endosc; 1999 Feb; 13(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 9918626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ergonomics: requirements for adjusting the height of laparoscopic operating tables.
    Matern U; Waller P; Giebmeyer C; Rückauer KD; Farthmann EH
    JSLS; 2001; 5(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 11303999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery.
    Berquer R; Smith WD; Davis S
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Mar; 16(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 11928019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved usability of a new handle design for laparoscopic dissection forceps.
    Veelen MA; Meijer DW; Goossens RH; Snijders CJ; Jakimowicz JJ
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Jan; 16(1):201-7. PubMed ID: 11961640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety.
    Siu J; Hill AG; MacCormick AD
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jan; 87(1-2):28-33. PubMed ID: 27878921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ergonomic design criteria for a novel laparoscopic tool handle with tactile feedback.
    Mårvik R; Nesbakken R; Langø T; Yavuz Y; Vanhauwaert Bjelland H; Ottermo MV; Stavdahl O
    Minerva Chir; 2006 Oct; 61(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 17159752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ergonomic testing of two different types of handles via virtual reality simulation.
    Matern U; Koneczny S; Tedeus M; Dietz K; Buess G
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Aug; 19(8):1147-50. PubMed ID: 15868271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study].
    Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt C; Morawe G; Encke A
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7887039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.