188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10632554)
1. MR cholangiopancreatography: value of axial and coronal fast Spin-Echo fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences.
Boraschi P; Braccini G; Gigoni R; Geloni M; Perri G
Eur J Radiol; 1999 Dec; 32(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 10632554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Choledocolithiasis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Three-year experience.
Boraschi P; Neri E; Braccini G; Gigoni R; Caramella D; Perri G; Bartolozzi C
Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Nov; 17(9):1245-53. PubMed ID: 10576709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography.
Guibaud L; Bret PM; Reinhold C; Atri M; Barkun AN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):847-50. PubMed ID: 8092021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Single shot fast spin echo sequence MRI cholangiopancreatography].
Lefèvre F; Crouzet P; Gaucher H; Chapuis F; Béot S; Boccaccini H; Bazin C; Régent D
J Radiol; 1998 May; 79(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9757270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique.
Barish MA; Yucel EK; Soto JA; Chuttani R; Ferrucci JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 7618543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pancreaticobiliary diseases. Comparison of 2D single-shot turbo spin-echo MR cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Arslan A; Geitung JT; Viktil E; Abdelnoor M; Osnes M
Acta Radiol; 2000 Nov; 41(6):621-6. PubMed ID: 11092486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR-cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP) and MR-angiography: morphologic changes with magnetic resonance imaging.
Vahldiek G; Broemel T; Klapdor R
Anticancer Res; 1999; 19(4A):2451-8. PubMed ID: 10470174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro and clinical studies of image acquisition in breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography: single-shot projection technique versus multislice technique.
Yamashita Y; Abe Y; Tang Y; Urata J; Sumi S; Takahashi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1449-54. PubMed ID: 9168706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Isotropic 3D T2-weighted MR cholangiopancreatography with parallel imaging: feasibility study.
Zhang J; Israel GM; Hecht EM; Krinsky GA; Babb JS; Lee VS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1564-70. PubMed ID: 17114551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation with MR cholangiography.
Boraschi P; Braccini G; Gigoni R; Sartoni G; Neri E; Filipponi F; Mosca F; Bartolozzi C
Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Oct; 19(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 11711234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.
Yoon LS; Catalano OA; Fritz S; Ferrone CR; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 19478628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.
Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo MRCP: comparison with two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo techniques.
Sodickson A; Mortele KJ; Barish MA; Zou KH; Thibodeau S; Tempany CM
Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):549-59. PubMed ID: 16436816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defining intrahepatic biliary anatomy in living liver transplant donor candidates at mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography versus conventional T2-weighted MR cholangiography.
Lee VS; Krinsky GA; Nazzaro CA; Chang JS; Babb JS; Lin JC; Morgan GR; Teperman LW
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):659-66. PubMed ID: 15516606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement of MR cholangiopancreatography at .5 T: three-dimensional half-averaged single-shot fast spin echo with multi-breath-hold technique.
Ichikawa T; Haradome H; Hanaoka H; Kassai Y; Nitatori T; Hachiya J; Araki T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1998; 8(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 9562076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography.
Alcaraz MJ; De la Morena EJ; Polo A; Ramos A; De la Cal MA; González Mandly A
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2000 Jul; 92(7):427-38. PubMed ID: 11026760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biliary complications after liver transplantation: Assessment with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR imaging at 3T device.
Boraschi P; Donati F; Pacciardi F; Ghinolfi D; Falaschi F
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():46-55. PubMed ID: 30150050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison between half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and two-dimensional turbo spin-echo pulse sequences.
Kim TK; Han JK; Kim SJ; Bae SH; Choi BI
Abdom Imaging; 1998; 23(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 9663276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of focal hepatic lesions with MR imaging: prospective comparison of T2-weighted fast spin-echo with and without fat suppression, T2-weighted breath-hold fast spin-echo, and gadolinium chelate-enhanced 3D gradient-recalled imaging.
Soyer P; de Givry SC; Gueye C; Lenormand S; Somveille E; Scherrer A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1115-21. PubMed ID: 8615254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional sequences.
Czerny C; Rand T; Gstoettner W; Woelfl G; Imhof H; Trattnig S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 9490977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
