These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10632554)

  • 1. MR cholangiopancreatography: value of axial and coronal fast Spin-Echo fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences.
    Boraschi P; Braccini G; Gigoni R; Geloni M; Perri G
    Eur J Radiol; 1999 Dec; 32(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 10632554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choledocolithiasis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Three-year experience.
    Boraschi P; Neri E; Braccini G; Gigoni R; Caramella D; Perri G; Bartolozzi C
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Nov; 17(9):1245-53. PubMed ID: 10576709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography.
    Guibaud L; Bret PM; Reinhold C; Atri M; Barkun AN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):847-50. PubMed ID: 8092021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Single shot fast spin echo sequence MRI cholangiopancreatography].
    Lefèvre F; Crouzet P; Gaucher H; Chapuis F; Béot S; Boccaccini H; Bazin C; Régent D
    J Radiol; 1998 May; 79(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9757270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique.
    Barish MA; Yucel EK; Soto JA; Chuttani R; Ferrucci JT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 7618543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pancreaticobiliary diseases. Comparison of 2D single-shot turbo spin-echo MR cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Arslan A; Geitung JT; Viktil E; Abdelnoor M; Osnes M
    Acta Radiol; 2000 Nov; 41(6):621-6. PubMed ID: 11092486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MR-cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP) and MR-angiography: morphologic changes with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Vahldiek G; Broemel T; Klapdor R
    Anticancer Res; 1999; 19(4A):2451-8. PubMed ID: 10470174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro and clinical studies of image acquisition in breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography: single-shot projection technique versus multislice technique.
    Yamashita Y; Abe Y; Tang Y; Urata J; Sumi S; Takahashi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1449-54. PubMed ID: 9168706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Isotropic 3D T2-weighted MR cholangiopancreatography with parallel imaging: feasibility study.
    Zhang J; Israel GM; Hecht EM; Krinsky GA; Babb JS; Lee VS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1564-70. PubMed ID: 17114551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation with MR cholangiography.
    Boraschi P; Braccini G; Gigoni R; Sartoni G; Neri E; Filipponi F; Mosca F; Bartolozzi C
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Oct; 19(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 11711234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.
    Yoon LS; Catalano OA; Fritz S; Ferrone CR; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 19478628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.
    Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo MRCP: comparison with two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo techniques.
    Sodickson A; Mortele KJ; Barish MA; Zou KH; Thibodeau S; Tempany CM
    Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):549-59. PubMed ID: 16436816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defining intrahepatic biliary anatomy in living liver transplant donor candidates at mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography versus conventional T2-weighted MR cholangiography.
    Lee VS; Krinsky GA; Nazzaro CA; Chang JS; Babb JS; Lin JC; Morgan GR; Teperman LW
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):659-66. PubMed ID: 15516606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improvement of MR cholangiopancreatography at .5 T: three-dimensional half-averaged single-shot fast spin echo with multi-breath-hold technique.
    Ichikawa T; Haradome H; Hanaoka H; Kassai Y; Nitatori T; Hachiya J; Araki T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1998; 8(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 9562076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography.
    Alcaraz MJ; De la Morena EJ; Polo A; Ramos A; De la Cal MA; González Mandly A
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2000 Jul; 92(7):427-38. PubMed ID: 11026760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biliary complications after liver transplantation: Assessment with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR imaging at 3T device.
    Boraschi P; Donati F; Pacciardi F; Ghinolfi D; Falaschi F
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():46-55. PubMed ID: 30150050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison between half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and two-dimensional turbo spin-echo pulse sequences.
    Kim TK; Han JK; Kim SJ; Bae SH; Choi BI
    Abdom Imaging; 1998; 23(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 9663276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of focal hepatic lesions with MR imaging: prospective comparison of T2-weighted fast spin-echo with and without fat suppression, T2-weighted breath-hold fast spin-echo, and gadolinium chelate-enhanced 3D gradient-recalled imaging.
    Soyer P; de Givry SC; Gueye C; Lenormand S; Somveille E; Scherrer A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1115-21. PubMed ID: 8615254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional sequences.
    Czerny C; Rand T; Gstoettner W; Woelfl G; Imhof H; Trattnig S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 9490977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.