130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10632758)
1. Computer-assisted assessment of sperm morphology: comparison with conventional techniques.
Marnet B; Vieitez G; Milhet P; Richoilley G; Lesourd F; Parinaud J
Int J Androl; 2000 Feb; 23(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 10632758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The importance of computer-assisted semen analysis and sperm function testing in an IVF program.
Joshi N; Kodwany G; Balaiah D; Parikh M; Parikh F
Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1996; 41(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8673156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of sperm preparation methods: effect on chromatin and morphology recovery rates and their consequences on the clinical outcome after in vitro fertilization embryo transfer.
Hammadeh ME; Kühnen A; Amer AS; Rosenbaum P; Schmidt W
Int J Androl; 2001 Dec; 24(6):360-8. PubMed ID: 11737417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sperm morphology evaluated by computer (IVOS) cannot predict the fertilization rate in vitro after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Sukcharoen N; Sithipravej T; Promviengchai S; Chinpilas V; Boonkasemsanti W
Fertil Steril; 1998 Mar; 69(3):564-8. PubMed ID: 9531900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reactive oxygen species, total antioxidant concentration of seminal plasma and their effect on sperm parameters and outcome of IVF/ICSI patients.
Hammadeh ME; Al Hasani S; Rosenbaum P; Schmidt W; Fischer Hammadeh C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Jun; 277(6):515-26. PubMed ID: 18026972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of the sperm quality analyser in predicting the outcome of assisted reproduction.
Mahmoud AM; Gordts S; Vereecken A; Serneels A; Campo R; Rombauts L; Comhaire FH
Int J Androl; 1998 Feb; 21(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 9639151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of human sperm chromatin status after selection using a modified Diff-Quik stain indicates embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization.
Tavares RS; Silva AF; Lourenço B; Almeida-Santos T; Sousa AP; Ramalho-Santos J
Andrology; 2013 Nov; 1(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 24124136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective study on the predictive value of normal sperm morphology as evaluated by computer (IVOS).
Kruger TF; Lacquet FA; Sarmiento CA; Menkveld R; Ozgür K; Lombard CJ; Franken DR
Fertil Steril; 1996 Aug; 66(2):285-91. PubMed ID: 8690118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection versus partial zona dissection, subzonal insemination and conventional techniques for oocyte insemination during in vitro fertilisation.
van Rumste MM; Evers JL; Farquhar CM; Blake DA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD001301. PubMed ID: 10796764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved sperm kinematics in semen samples collected after 2 h versus 4-7 days of ejaculation abstinence.
Alipour H; Van Der Horst G; Christiansen OB; Dardmeh F; Jørgensen N; Nielsen HI; Hnida C
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1364-1372. PubMed ID: 28531319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does computerized image analysis of sperm movement enhance the predictive value of semen analysis for in-vitro fertilization results?
Grunert JH; de Geyter C; Bordt J; Schneider HP; Nieschlag E
Int J Androl; 1989 Oct; 12(5):329-38. PubMed ID: 2592121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of computer-assisted sperm motion analysis.
De Geyter C; De Geyter M; Koppers B; Nieschlag E
Hum Reprod; 1998 Sep; 13(9):2512-20. PubMed ID: 9806276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) potential of human spermatozoa using sperm function tests: the effect of the delay between testing and IVF.
Sukcharoen N; Keith J; Irvine DS; Aitken RJ
Hum Reprod; 1996 May; 11(5):1030-4. PubMed ID: 8671385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sperm DNA adducts impair fertilization during ICSI but not during IVF.
Horák S; Olejek A; Widłak P
Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2007; 45 Suppl 1():S99-104. PubMed ID: 18292844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anti-sperm antibody levels are not related to fertilization or pregnancy rates after IVF or IVF/ICSI.
Zini A; Lefebvre J; Kornitzer G; Bissonnette F; Kadoch IJ; Dean N; Phillips S
J Reprod Immunol; 2011 Jan; 88(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 21111486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a cut-off value for sperm motility after different hours of incubation to select the suitable reproductive technology (IVF or ICSI).
Zollner U; Martin S; Liebermann J; Steck T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Apr; 78(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 10203301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates.
Lin MH; Kuo-Kuang Lee R; Li SH; Lu CH; Sun FJ; Hwu YM
Fertil Steril; 2008 Aug; 90(2):352-9. PubMed ID: 17904130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of the sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation level, as measured by the sperm chromatin dispersion test, in the outcome of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Muriel L; Garrido N; Fernández JL; Remohí J; Pellicer A; de los Santos MJ; Meseguer M
Fertil Steril; 2006 Feb; 85(2):371-83. PubMed ID: 16595214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are the characteristics of spermatozoa in the insemination medium useful for predicting in-vitro fertilization results?
Parinaud J; Richoilley G; Moutaffian H; Vieitez G; Mieusset R
Int J Androl; 1996 Apr; 19(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 8737041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sperm DNA fragmentation index, as measured by sperm chromatin dispersion, might not predict assisted reproductive outcome.
Sun TC; Zhang Y; Li HT; Liu XM; Yi DX; Tian L; Liu YX
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 57(4):493-498. PubMed ID: 30122567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
