These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10632843)

  • 1. Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator. Part II. An SEM evaluation.
    Yap AU; Ong LF; Teoh SH; Hastings GW
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Jan; 27(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10632843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator.
    Yap AU; Ong LF; Teoh SH; Hastings GW
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Mar; 26(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 10194732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of water exposure on three-body wear of composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Teoh SH; Tan KB
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Sep; 53(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 10984703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of cyclic loading on occlusal contact area wear of composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Teoh SH; Chew CL
    Dent Mater; 2002 Mar; 18(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 11755594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro two-body wear of inlay-onlay composite resin restoratives.
    Burgoyne AR; Nicholls JI; Brudvik JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 2051355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative wear ranking of dental restorative materials utilizing different wear simulation modes.
    Yap AU; Teoh SH; Hastings GW; Lu CS
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Aug; 24(8):574-80. PubMed ID: 9291250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two- and three-body wear of composite resins.
    Koottathape N; Takahashi H; Iwasaki N; Kanehira M; Finger WJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1261-70. PubMed ID: 23083806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-body in vitro wear study of some current dental composites and amalgams.
    Hu X; Marquis PM; Shortall AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 10424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials.
    Yesil ZD; Alapati S; Johnston W; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):435-43. PubMed ID: 18514665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel.
    Kadokawa A; Suzuki S; Tanaka T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wear resistance of hybrid composite resin for crown material by the two-body sliding test.
    Suese K; Kawazoe T
    Dent Mater J; 2002 Sep; 21(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 12474950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Study of Two-Body Wear Performance of Dental Materials.
    Hu X; Zhang Q; Ning J; Wu W; Li C
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2018 Jun; 110(3):250-255. PubMed ID: 29778127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wear testing of composite, gold, porcelain, and enamel opposing a removable cobalt-chromium partial denture alloy.
    Alarcon JV; Engelmeier RL; Powers JM; Triolo PT
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 19374708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre-clinical screening for wear of posterior composite resins.
    Suzuki S; Osborne JW; Leinfelder KF
    J Esthet Dent; 1996; 8(6):263-8. PubMed ID: 9468848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Localized three-body wear of resin composites.
    Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():19-27. PubMed ID: 8935090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wear characteristics in a two-body wear test.
    Wassell RW; McCabe JF; Walls AW
    Dent Mater; 1994 Jul; 10(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 7664996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro quantitative assessment of generalized wear of dental composites.
    Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():9-18. PubMed ID: 8935089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear.
    Lazaridou D; Belli R; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1485-92. PubMed ID: 25491442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator.
    Condon JR; Ferracane JL
    Dent Mater; 1996 Jul; 12(4):218-26. PubMed ID: 9002838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives.
    Suzuki S; Nagai E; Taira Y; Minesaki Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 12447221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.