These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10632848)

  • 1. Pilot study of the cyclic fatigue characteristics of five endodontic posts with four core materials.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Jan; 27(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 10632848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cyclic fatigue testing of five endodontic post designs supported by four core materials.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Nov; 78(5):458-64. PubMed ID: 9399187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with three different endodontic posts.
    Cohen BI; Condos S; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 8003200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cyclic fatigue testing of six endodontic post systems.
    Cohen BI; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthodont; 1993 Mar; 2(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8374709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Condos S; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Nov; 76(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 8933438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention of a core material supported by three post head designs.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):624-8. PubMed ID: 10842128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 9597604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of five core materials.
    Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17244304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pilot study comparing the photoelastic stress distribution for four endodontic post systems.
    Cohen BI; Condos S; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Oct; 23(10):679-85. PubMed ID: 8933385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the torsional forces at failure for seven endodontic post systems.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo M; Condos S; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Oct; 74(4):350-7. PubMed ID: 8531151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Torsional resistance of crowns cemented to composite cores involving three stainless steel endodontic post designs.
    Cohen BI; Penugonda B; Pagnillo MK; Schulman A; Hittelman E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 10898840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture strengths of three core restorative materials supported with or without a prefabricated split-shank post.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Dec; 78(6):560-5. PubMed ID: 9421784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of cyclic loading on selected post-and-core systems.
    Reagan SE; Fruits TJ; Van Brunt CL; Ward CK
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jan; 30(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 10323160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars.
    Bolhuis P; de Gee A; Feilzer A
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Sep; 35(8):657-67. PubMed ID: 15366533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.
    Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A preliminary comparative study of the retentive properties of four post and core systems in etched preparations.
    Gelfand M
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1992 Aug; 58(8):665-6, 669-70. PubMed ID: 1504906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.
    Solomon CS; Osman YI
    SADJ; 2011 Jun; 66(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 23193862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of different post design and composition on stress distribution in maxillary central incisor: Finite element analysis.
    Silva NR; Castro CG; Santos-Filho PC; Silva GR; Campos RE; Soares PV; Soares CJ
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19553714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resistance to horizontal forces of dowel and amalgam-core restorations: a comparative study.
    Gordon M; Metzger Z
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Jul; 14(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 3305840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro fatigue resistance of glass ionomer cements used in post-and-core applications.
    Gateau P; Sabek M; Dailey B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Aug; 86(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 11514801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.