These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10633263)

  • 1. Localized damage in vertebral bone is most detrimental in regions of high strain energy density.
    Kopperdahl DL; Roberts AD; Keaveny TM
    J Biomech Eng; 1999 Dec; 121(6):622-8. PubMed ID: 10633263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite element modeling of the human thoracolumbar spine.
    Liebschner MA; Kopperdahl DL; Rosenberg WS; Keaveny TM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 12642762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of cortical shell and trabecular fabric in finite element analysis of the human vertebral body.
    Chevalier Y; Pahr D; Zysset PK
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Nov; 131(11):111003. PubMed ID: 20353254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental validation of finite element analysis of human vertebral collapse under large compressive strains.
    Hosseini HS; Clouthier AL; Zysset PK
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Apr; 136(4):. PubMed ID: 24384581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical consequences of an isolated overload on the human vertebral body.
    Kopperdahl DL; Pearlman JL; Keaveny TM
    J Orthop Res; 2000 Sep; 18(5):685-90. PubMed ID: 11117287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element models of the human lumbar vertebral body: effect of element size on stiffness, damage, and fracture strength predictions.
    Crawford RP; Rosenberg WS; Keaveny TM
    J Biomech Eng; 2003 Aug; 125(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 12968567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. HR-pQCT-based homogenised finite element models provide quantitative predictions of experimental vertebral body stiffness and strength with the same accuracy as μFE models.
    Pahr DH; Dall'Ara E; Varga P; Zysset PK
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(7):711-20. PubMed ID: 21480081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlation of vertebral strength topography with 3-dimensional computed tomographic structure.
    Noshchenko A; Plaseied A; Patel VV; Burger E; Baldini T; Yun L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 22869060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of local proximal tibial subchondral bone structural stiffness using subject-specific finite element modeling: Effect of selected density-modulus relationship.
    Nazemi SM; Amini M; Kontulainen SA; Milner JS; Holdsworth DW; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Johnston JD
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Aug; 30(7):703-12. PubMed ID: 26024555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Burst fracture in the metastatically involved spine: development, validation, and parametric analysis of a three-dimensional poroelastic finite-element model.
    Whyne CM; Hu SS; Lotz JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(7):652-60. PubMed ID: 12671351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative computed tomography estimates of the mechanical properties of human vertebral trabecular bone.
    Kopperdahl DL; Morgan EF; Keaveny TM
    J Orthop Res; 2002 Jul; 20(4):801-5. PubMed ID: 12168670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative Computed Tomography Protocols Affect Material Mapping and Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite-Element Analysis Predicted Stiffness.
    Giambini H; Dragomir-Daescu D; Nassr A; Yaszemski MJ; Zhao C
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Sep; 138(9):0910031-7. PubMed ID: 27428281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An experimentally validated finite element method for augmented vertebral bodies.
    Kinzl M; Schwiedrzik J; Zysset PK; Pahr DH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Jan; 28(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 23084871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A patient-specific finite element methodology to predict damage accumulation in vertebral bodies under axial compression, sagittal flexion and combined loads.
    Chevalier Y; Charlebois M; Pahr D; Varga P; Heini P; Schneider E; Zysset P
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2008 Oct; 11(5):477-87. PubMed ID: 18608338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Damage in trabecular bone at small strains.
    Morgan EF; Yeh OC; Keaveny TM
    Eur J Morphol; 2005; 42(1-2):13-21. PubMed ID: 16123020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of vertebral and femoral trabecular morphology and stiffness using a flat-panel C-arm-based CT approach.
    Mulder L; van Rietbergen B; Noordhoek NJ; Ito K
    Bone; 2012 Jan; 50(1):200-8. PubMed ID: 22057082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of vertebral strength in vitro by spinal bone densitometry and calcaneal ultrasound.
    Cheng XG; Nicholson PH; Boonen S; Lowet G; Brys P; Aerssens J; Van der Perre G; Dequeker J
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Oct; 12(10):1721-8. PubMed ID: 9333134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A three-dimensional finite element model of the cervical spine with spinal cord: an investigation of three injury mechanisms.
    Greaves CY; Gadala MS; Oxland TR
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 36(3):396-405. PubMed ID: 18228144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine.
    Kayanja MM; Togawa D; Lieberman IH
    Spine J; 2005; 5(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15653085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite element modeling of trabecular bone damage.
    Kosmopoulos V; Keller TS
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Jun; 6(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 12888432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.