476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10633514)
1. Efficacy of a computerized local anesthesia device in pediatric dentistry.
Asarch T; Allen K; Petersen B; Beiraghi S
Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(7):421-4. PubMed ID: 10633514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Wand vs. traditional injection: a comparison of pain related behaviors.
Gibson RS; Allen K; Hutfless S; Beiraghi S
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 11132503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of a computerized anesthesia device with a traditional syringe in preschool children.
Allen KD; Kotil D; Larzelere RE; Hutfless S; Beiraghi S
Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 12212873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe.
Ram D; Peretz B
J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 14528773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized anesthesia delivery system vs. traditional syringe: comparing pain and pain-related behavior in children.
Versloot J; Veerkamp JS; Hoogstraten J
Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 16324138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pain behaviour and distress in children during two sequential dental visits: comparing a computerised anaesthesia delivery system and a traditional syringe.
Versloot J; Veerkamp JS; Hoogstraten J
Br Dent J; 2008 Jul; 205(1):E2; discussion 30-1. PubMed ID: 18493254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The wand in pulp therapy: an alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block.
Oztaş N; Ulusu T; Bodur H; Doğan C
Quintessence Int; 2005; 36(7-8):559-64. PubMed ID: 15997937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pain perception and utility: a comparison of the syringe and computerized local injection techniques.
Nicholson JW; Berry TG; Summitt JB; Yuan CH; Witten TM
Gen Dent; 2001; 49(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 12004696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the pain reaction of children receiving periodontal ligament anesthesia using a computerized device (Wand).
Ran D; Peretz B
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 27(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 12739685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The wand versus traditional injection for mandibular nerve block in children and adolescents: perceived pain and time of onset.
Palm AM; Kirkegaard U; Poulsen S
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(6):481-4. PubMed ID: 15646908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Wand revisited.
Casagrande ER
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(3):186. PubMed ID: 10846726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of various modes of computerized delivery of local anesthesia in primary maxillary molars.
Ashkenazi M; Blumer S; Eli I
Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 16615373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 21st century computerized injection system for local pain control.
Friedman MJ; Hochman MN
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Oct; 18(10):995-1000, 1002-3; quiz 1004. PubMed ID: 9533309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pain Perception: Computerized versus Traditional Local Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients.
Mittal M; Kumar A; Srivastava D; Sharma P; Sharma S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(5):470-4. PubMed ID: 26551372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advanced techniques and armamentarium for dental local anesthesia.
Clark TM; Yagiela JA
Dent Clin North Am; 2010 Oct; 54(4):757-68. PubMed ID: 20831937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of dental practitioners in injection techniques: computerized device and traditional syringe.
Koyuturk AE; Avsar A; Sumer M
Quintessence Int; 2009 Jan; 40(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 19159026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient and dentist satisfaction with a computerized local anesthetic injection system.
Grace EG; Barnes DM; Macek MD; Tatum N
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Sep; 21(9):746-8, 750, 752. PubMed ID: 11199649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the pain perception in children using comfort control syringe and a conventional injection technique during pediatric dental procedures.
Langthasa M; Yeluri R; Jain AA; Munshi AK
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 23514685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of single tooth anaesthesia by computer-controlled local anaesthetic delivery system (C-CLADS) with a supraperiosteal traditional syringe injection in paediatric dentistry.
Perugia C; Bartolino M; Docimo R
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Sep; 18(3):221-225. PubMed ID: 29254346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Nusstein J; Berlin J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver JM
Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 15675261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
