These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

738 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10635104)

  • 21. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; Vizzotto MB; Da Silveira PF; Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25311793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
    Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
    Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Current practice in conventional and digital intraoral radiography: problems and solutions.
    Fuhrmann AW
    Int J Comput Dent; 2006 Jan; 9(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 16608054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical study of the sensitivity and dynamic range of three digital systems, E-speed film and digitized film.
    Bóscolo FN; Oliveira AE; Almeida SM; Haiter CF; Haiter Neto F
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 11696917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Brown WP; Lewis J; Benefiel M; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10980561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of imaging system and exposure on accurate detection of the second mesio-buccal canal in maxillary molar teeth.
    Ramamurthy R; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec; 102(6):796-802. PubMed ID: 17138184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography.
    Hildebolt CF; Couture RA; Whiting BR
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):273-97, vi. PubMed ID: 10740769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique.
    Geelen W; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E; Kruger M; Hansson LG
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 9699411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.
    Samei E
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How does signal fade on photo-stimulable storage phosphor imaging plates when scanned with a delay and what is the effect on image quality?
    Ang DB; Angelopoulos C; Katz JO
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Nov; 102(5):673-9. PubMed ID: 17052646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computed radiography with photostimulable phosphor in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
    Kashima I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Nov; 80(5):577-98. PubMed ID: 8556466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Integrating photo-stimulable phosphor plates into dental and dental hygiene radiography curricula.
    Tax CL; Robb CL; Brillant MG; Doucette HJ
    J Dent Educ; 2013 Nov; 77(11):1451-60. PubMed ID: 24192410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of tube potential setting and dose on the visibility of lesions in intraoral radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 17403883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for the assessment of marginal bone level around oral implants.
    De Smet E; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Naert I
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 12058265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Imaging of root canal fillings: a comparison of subjective image quality between limited cone-beam CT, storage phosphor and film radiography.
    Soğur E; Baksi BG; Gröndahl HG
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 17305694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.