These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10635277)

  • 1. The effect of finishing and polishing on the decision to replace existing amalgam restorations.
    Cardoso M; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 10635277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of finishing and polishing procedures on the decision to replace old amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Oleinisky JC; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV; Felipe LA; de Freitas SF
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Dec; 27(12):833-40. PubMed ID: 9452677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Student and faculty perceptions in the assessment of amalgam restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2000; 80(2):28-31. PubMed ID: 11324025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repair or replacement of amalgam restorations: decisions at a USA and a UK dental school.
    Setcos JC; Khosravi R; Wilson NH; Shen C; Yang M; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 15279477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings.
    Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Veiga Filho LC; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(10):735-40. PubMed ID: 11204001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Placement and replacement of dental restorations.
    Mahmood S; Chohan AN; Al-Jannakh M; Al-Baker H; Smales RJ
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2004 Oct; 14(10):589-92. PubMed ID: 15456546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of polishing burs and stones on the micro-hardness of dental amalgam.
    Ribeiro SA; do Nascimento TN; Centola AL; Teixeira LC; Campos SM
    Braz Dent J; 1992; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 1290913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial.
    Moncada GC; Martin J; Fernandez E; Vildosola PG; Caamano C; Caro MJ; Mjor IA; Gordan VV
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(5):314-8. PubMed ID: 17004564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany.
    Friedl KH; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(6):228-32. PubMed ID: 9028243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the dental structure loss produced during maintenance and replacement of occlusal amalgam restorations.
    Sardenberg F; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Imparato JC; Mendes FM
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(3):242-6. PubMed ID: 18949310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examiner agreement in the replacement decision of Class I amalgam restorations.
    Ermis RB; Aydin U
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May; 5(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 15150636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exposure to mercury vapor during setting, removing, and polishing amalgam restorations.
    Haikel Y; Gasser P; Salek P; Voegel JC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Nov; 24(11):1551-8. PubMed ID: 2279986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repair or replacement of restorations: do we accept built in obsolescence or do we improve the evidence?
    Sharif MO; Fedorowicz Z; Tickle M; Brunton PA
    Br Dent J; 2010 Aug; 209(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 20798721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Optimizing marginal fit of amalgam restorations on the cervico-interproximal aspect].
    Hannig M; Lauffs HJ; Albers HK
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jul; 44(7):548-51. PubMed ID: 2630287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removal, replacement and placement of amalgam restorations by Ontario dentists in 2002.
    Adegbembo AO; Watson PA
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):565. PubMed ID: 16202194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical evaluation of the amalgam restorations for Class I and Class II cavities. I: Influence of localization, size, age and polishing of fillings as well as patient age and oral hygiene on the quality of restorations].
    Weiland M; Nossek H; Schulz P
    Stomatol DDR; 1988 Dec; 38(12):801-5. PubMed ID: 3253982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.