These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10635506)

  • 1. Fraud, misconduct or normal science in medical research--an empirical study of demarcation.
    Lynöe N; Jacobsson L; Lundgren E
    J Med Ethics; 1999 Dec; 25(6):501-6. PubMed ID: 10635506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific dishonesty--questionnaire to doctoral students in Sweden.
    Nilstun T; Löfmark R; Lundqvist A
    J Med Ethics; 2010 May; 36(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 20439329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.
    Okonta P; Rossouw T
    Dev World Bioeth; 2013 Dec; 13(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 22994914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Dishonesty in medical research. A questionnaire study among project administrators in Health Region 4].
    Hals A; Jacobsen G
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Oct; 113(25):3149-52. PubMed ID: 8273040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical investigators' views about ethics and fraud in medical research.
    Jacobsen G; Hals A
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1995; 29(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 8847683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Science ethics education part II: changes in attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers after a short course in science ethics.
    Vuckovic-Dekic L; Gavrilovic D; Kezic I; Bogdanovic G; Brkic S
    J BUON; 2012; 17(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 22740224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating U.S. medical schools' efforts to educate faculty researchers on research integrity and research misconduct policies and procedures.
    Titus SL
    Account Res; 2014; 21(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 24073604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific Dishonesty: A Survey of Doctoral Students at the Major Medical Faculties in Sweden and Norway.
    Hofmann B; Helgesson G; Juth N; Holm S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Oct; 10(4):380-8. PubMed ID: 26333685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research integrity among PhD students within clinical research at the University of Southern Denmark.
    Jensen LB; Kyvik KO; Leth-Larsen R; Eriksen MB
    Dan Med J; 2018 Apr; 65(4):. PubMed ID: 29619924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publication misconduct: Perceptions of participants of a faculty development programme.
    Singh SP; Dhir SK; Sharma M; Singh T
    Natl Med J India; 2018; 31(3):169-171. PubMed ID: 31044767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attitude, practice orientation, benefits and barriers towards health research and publications among medical practitioners in Abia State, Nigeria: A cross-sectional study.
    Pascal Iloh GU; Amadi AN; Iro OK; Agboola SM; Aguocha GU; Chukwuonye ME
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Feb; 23(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 32031085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating the Reliability and Factor Structure of Kalichman's "Survey 2: Research Misconduct" Questionnaire: A Post Hoc Analysis Among Biomedical Doctoral Students in Scandinavia.
    Holm S; Hofmann B
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Oct; 12(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 28707501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: a national survey.
    Pryor ER; Habermann B; Broome ME
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Jun; 33(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 17526690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Korean medical students' attitudes toward academic misconduct: a cross-sectional multicenter study.
    Chung EK; Lee YM; Chae SJ; Yoon TY; Kim SY; Park SY; Park JY; Park CS
    Korean J Med Educ; 2019 Dec; 31(4):309-317. PubMed ID: 31813197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How researchers perceive research misconduct in biomedicine and how they would prevent it: A qualitative study in a small scientific community.
    Buljan I; Barać L; Marušić A
    Account Res; 2018; 25(4):220-238. PubMed ID: 29637796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Account Res; 2019 Oct; 26(7):405-426. PubMed ID: 31379202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country.
    Okonta PI; Rossouw T
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 15():25. PubMed ID: 24666413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire--Revised (SMQ-R): validation and psychometric testing.
    Broome ME; Pryor E; Habermann B; Pulley L; Kincaid H
    Account Res; 2005; 12(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 16578917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Research misconduct: Knowledge, actions and attitudes of PhD candidates].
    Hofmann B; Holm S
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2016 Sep; 136(17):1442-7. PubMed ID: 27686203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.