These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10636049)

  • 41. A new sonographic weight formula for fetuses Siemer J; Hilbert A; Hart N; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
    Ultraschall Med; 2009 Feb; 30(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 19137495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
    Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An analysis of birth weight by gestational age using a computerized perinatal data base, 1975-1992.
    Amini SB; Catalano PM; Hirsch V; Mann LI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Mar; 83(3):342-52. PubMed ID: 8127523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Accuracy of sonographically estimated fetal weight in 840 women with different pregnancy complications prior to induction of labor.
    Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Bar J; Mashiach R; Kaplan B; Hod M; Meizner I
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 23(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 14770399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Predicting fetal weight. Are Leopold's maneuvers still worth teaching to medical students and house staff?
    Nahum GG
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Apr; 47(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 12012878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Validation study of the capacity of the reference curves of ultrasonographic measurements of the umbilical cord to identify deviations in estimated fetal weight.
    Barbieri C; Cecatti JG; Krupa F; Marussi EF; Costa JV
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18307067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of Fetal Weight Estimation Formulas in Assessing Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses.
    Barel O; Maymon R; Elovits M; Smorgick N; Tovbin J; Vaknin Z
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Jun; 37(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 25075910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Fetal weight estimation in children of diabetes mellitus mothers].
    García de Yeguez M; Castro Valderrama CR; Yegüez F; Rivas Blasco A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2007 Jan; 75(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 17542262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Validation of a model for optimal birth weight: a prospective study using serial ultrasounds.
    Pereira G; Blair E; Lawrence D
    BMC Pediatr; 2012 Jun; 12():73. PubMed ID: 22703448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Fetal size monitoring and birth-weight prediction: a new population-based approach.
    Gjessing HK; Grøttum P; Økland I; Eik-Nes SH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):500-507. PubMed ID: 27130245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight: use of targeted formulas in small for gestational age fetuses.
    Robson SC; Gallivan S; Walkinshaw SA; Vaughan J; Rodeck CH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 8355934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Second-trimester fetal growth and the risk of poor obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
    Fox NS; Huang M; Chasen ST
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 32(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18435526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: experience with 1034 parturients.
    Chauhan SP; Hendrix NW; Magann EF; Morrison JC; Kenney SP; Devoe LD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 91(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 9464724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fetuses subsequently born premature are smaller than gestational age-matched fetuses not born premature.
    Doubilet PM; Benson CB; Wilkins-Haug L; Ringer S
    J Ultrasound Med; 2003 Apr; 22(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 12693619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Validity of sonographic formulas for estimating fetal weight below 1,250 g: a series of 119 cases.
    Jouannic JM; Grangé G; Goffinet F; Benachi A; Carbrol D
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2001; 16(4):254-8. PubMed ID: 11433125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Conventional birth weight standards obscure fetal growth restriction in preterm infants.
    Cooke RW
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2007 May; 92(3):F189-92. PubMed ID: 16547077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accuracy of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in predicting actual birth weight in Enugu, Southeastern Nigeria.
    Ugwu EO; Udealor PC; Dim CC; Obi SN; Ozumba BC; Okeke DO; Agu PU
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 24714001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Biophysical and biochemical markers at 30-34 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
    Valiño N; Giunta G; Gallo DM; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 47(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 26094952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Customized and non-customized live-born birth-weight curves of single and uncomplicated pregnancies from the Burgundy perinatal network. Part I - methodology.
    Rousseau T; Durand-Maison O; Labruere-Chazal C; Tabard F; Jebrane A; Martz O; Benzenine E; Cottenet J; Sagot P
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Sep; 46(7):587-590. PubMed ID: 28529058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cervical fetal fibronectin in patients at increased risk for preterm delivery.
    Bittar RE; Yamasaki AA; Sasaki S; Zugaib M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):178-81. PubMed ID: 8694047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.