These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Developments in human reproduction and their eugenic, ethical implications. Proceedings of the nineteenth annual symposium of the Eugenics Society, London 1982. Proc Annu Symp Eugen Soc; 1983; 19():1-240. PubMed ID: 6669521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Changing opinions of Mexican geneticists on ethical issues. Lisker R; Carnevale A Arch Med Res; 2006 Aug; 37(6):794-803. PubMed ID: 16824941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Genetic testing, governance, and the family in the People's Republic of China. Sleeboom-Faulkner ME Soc Sci Med; 2011 Jun; 72(11):1802-9. PubMed ID: 20627498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Chinese geneticists approach ethics. Mao X J Med Genet; 1998 Jan; 35(1):83. PubMed ID: 9475105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Screening Jews and genes: a consideration of the ethics of genetic screening within the Jewish community: challenges and responses. Levin M Genet Test; 1999; 3(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 10464669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions. Charo RA Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Toward an ethical eugenics: the case for mandatory preimplantation genetic selection. Appel JM JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 2012; 14(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 22367014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Genetic screening--uses, potential abuses and ethical issues. Jacobs R Occup Med (Lond); 1997 Aug; 47(6):367-70. PubMed ID: 9327641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cultural difference and the eugenics law. Guo SW Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Oct; 65(4):1197-9,author reply 1199-201. PubMed ID: 10486339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Ethical and social issues in prenatal sex selection: a survey of geneticists in 37 nations. Wertz DC; Fletcher JC Soc Sci Med; 1998 Jan; 46(2):255-73. PubMed ID: 9447647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Framing utility: Regulatory reform and genetic tests in the USA, 1989-2000. Sturdy S Soc Sci Med; 2022 Jul; 304():112924. PubMed ID: 32245545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Screening for disability: a eugenic pursuit? Gillott J J Med Ethics; 2001 Oct; 27 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii21-3. PubMed ID: 11574654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Genetic screening and haemoglobinopathies: ethics, politics and practice. Atkin K; Ahmad WI Soc Sci Med; 1998 Feb; 46(3):445-58. PubMed ID: 9460825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Providers' gender and moral reasoning: a proposed agenda for research on providers and patients. Wertz DC Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):81-9. PubMed ID: 11653026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [To design "the baby one wishes for" is theoretically possible. Ethical issues in preimplantation diagnosis must be defined]. Lindblad A Lakartidningen; 2000 Nov; 97(48):5643-7. PubMed ID: 11187382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]