148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10636782)
1. Scientific misconduct. Europe stresses prevention rather than cure.
Hagmann M
Science; 1999 Dec; 286(5448):2258-9. PubMed ID: 10636782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific misconduct in medical research.
Verma BL; Shukla GD
J Indian Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 90(8):222-5. PubMed ID: 1460306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research misconduct: a brief history and a comparison.
Lock S
J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 8308474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevention and management of fraud--in theory.
Riis P
J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 8308472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research ethics in Eastern Europe.
Szawarski Z
Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Oct; No. 82():13-8. PubMed ID: 11651511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research ethics exists beyond Helsinki.
Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Aug; No. 150():3-5. PubMed ID: 11657792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters.
Farthing MJ
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1729-31. PubMed ID: 9652922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The functions of ethical committees.
Deutsch E
J Int Bioethique; 1990 Sep; 1(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 11651006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The need for a national body for research misconduct. Nothing less will reassure the public.
Smith R
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1686-7. PubMed ID: 9614011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific fraud: Europe must address research misconduct.
Bosch X
Nature; 2011 Dec; 480(7376):181. PubMed ID: 22158229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Time to face up to research misconduct.
Smith R
BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):789-90. PubMed ID: 8608272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research ethics review in Australia, Europe and North America.
McNeill PM
IRB; 1989; 11(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 11650207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Misconduct in research. Misconduct is not reported in biomedical journals in France.
Maisonneuve H
BMJ; 1996 Jul; 313(7049):109. PubMed ID: 8688718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Burdens of proof of misconduct.
Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6573):367. PubMed ID: 8602225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Honest advice from Denmark.
Riis P
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1733. PubMed ID: 9652924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Editors call for misconduct watchdog.
Williams N
Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1685-6. PubMed ID: 9660704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct.
Chalmers I
JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1405-8. PubMed ID: 2304220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific misconduct: exaggerated fear but still real and requiring a proportionate response.
Horton R
Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9172):7-8. PubMed ID: 10406357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Tobacco company set up network of sympathetic scientists.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1998 May; 316(7144):1555. PubMed ID: 11645059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Promotion of ethics in gastroenterology: joint meeting of the members of JSGE and OMGE.
International Workshop on Promotion of Ethics in Gastroenterology, Tokyo, Japan, 8-10 Apr 1992
Gastroenterol Jpn; 1993 Jul; 28(Suppl. 6):45-54. PubMed ID: 11654959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
