185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10637142)
1. Abdominal aortic aneurysm measurements for endovascular repair: intra- and interobserver variability of CT measurements.
Aarts NJ; Schurink GW; Schultze Kool LJ; Bode PJ; van Baalen JM; Hermans J; van Bockel JH
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1999 Dec; 18(6):475-80. PubMed ID: 10637142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra- and interobserver variability in the measurements of abdominal aortic and common iliac artery diameter with computed tomography. The Tromsø study.
Singh K; Jacobsen BK; Solberg S; Bønaa KH; Kumar S; Bajic R; Arnesen E
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2003 May; 25(5):399-407. PubMed ID: 12713777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multidetector CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for aortoiliac length measurements prior to endovascular AAA repair.
Diehm N; Herrmann P; Dinkel HP
J Endovasc Ther; 2004 Oct; 11(5):527-34. PubMed ID: 15482025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional CT angiography in analysis of anatomical suitability for stentgraft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Pitoulias GA; Donas KP; Schulte S; Aslanidou EA; Papadimitriou DK
Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 21498369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonenhanced MRI Planning for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced CT Angiography.
Piacentino F; Fontana F; Micieli C; Angeretti MG; Cardim LN; Coppola A; Molinelli V; Piffaretti G; Novario R; Fugazzola C
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2018 Jan; 52(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 29162027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Observer variability of iliac artery measurements in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Lal BK; Cerveira JJ; Seidman C; Haser PB; Kubicka R; Jamil Z; Padberg FT; Hobson RW; Pappas PJ
Ann Vasc Surg; 2004 Nov; 18(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 15599621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative planning for endovascular aortic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: feasibility of nonenhanced MR angiography versus contrast-enhanced CT angiography.
Goshima S; Kanematsu M; Kondo H; Kawada H; Kojima T; Sakurai K; Watanabe H; Shimabukuro K; Matsuno Y; Ishida N; Takemura H; Bae KT
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):948-55. PubMed ID: 23392427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal technique for imaging iliac segments during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Oshin OA; Bown MJ; McWilliams RG; Brennan JA; Vallabhaneni SR
J Endovasc Ther; 2009 Jun; 16(3):373-9. PubMed ID: 19642797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of interpretation of CT-angiography in patients with a suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.
Hoornweg LL; Wisselink W; Vahl AC; Reekers JA; van Delden OM; Legemate DA; Balm R
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Mar; 35(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 17988903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated software supported versus manual aorto-iliac diameter measurements in CT angiography of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms: assessment of inter- and intraobserver variation.
Diehm N; Baumgartner I; Silvestro A; Herrmann P; Triller J; Schmidli J; Do DD; Dinkel HP
Vasa; 2005 Nov; 34(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 16363281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of aortoiliac aneurysm before endovascular repair: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with multidetector row computed tomographic angiography with an automated analysis software tool.
Lutz AM; Willmann JK; Pfammatter T; Lachat M; Wildermuth S; Marincek B; Weishaupt D
J Vasc Surg; 2003 Mar; 37(3):619-27. PubMed ID: 12618702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra- and interobserver variability of aortic aneurysm volume measurement with fast CTA postprocessing software.
van Prehn J; van der Wal MB; Vincken K; Bartels LW; Moll FL; van Herwaarden JA
J Endovasc Ther; 2008 Oct; 15(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 18840051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective intraindividual comparison of unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the planning of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Saida T; Mori K; Sato F; Shindo M; Takahashi H; Takahashi N; Sakakibara Y; Minami M
J Vasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 55(3):679-87. PubMed ID: 22104342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of aortoiliac tortuosity on endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: evaluation of 3D computer-based assessment.
Wolf YG; Tillich M; Lee WA; Rubin GD; Fogarty TJ; Zarins CK
J Vasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 34(4):594-9. PubMed ID: 11668310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aneurysmal sizing after endovascular repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: interobserver variability of various measurement protocols and its clinical relevance.
Abada HT; Sapoval MR; Paul JF; de Maertelaer V; Mousseaux E; Gaux JC
Eur Radiol; 2003 Dec; 13(12):2699-704. PubMed ID: 12827425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter- and intraobserver variability of CT measurements obtained after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Wever JJ; Blankensteijn JD; van Rijn JC; Broeders IA; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1279-82. PubMed ID: 11044022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated quantification of aortoaortic and aortoiliac angulation for computed tomographic angiography of abdominal aortic aneurysms before endovascular repair: preliminary study.
Raman B; Raman R; Napel S; Rubin GD
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1746-50. PubMed ID: 20932776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of 64-row computed tomography abdominal aortic aneurysm neck measurements.
Diehm N; Kickuth R; Gahl B; Do DD; Schmidli J; Rattunde H; Baumgartner I; Dick F
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Feb; 45(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 17264000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Length measurements of the aorta after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Wever JJ; Blankensteijn JD; Broeders IA; Eikelboom BC
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1999 Dec; 18(6):481-6. PubMed ID: 10637143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The difference between ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) measurements of aortic diameter increases with aortic diameter: analysis of axial images of abdominal aortic and common iliac artery diameter in normal and aneurysmal aortas. The Tromsø Study, 1994-1995.
Singh K; Jacobsen BK; Solberg S; Kumar S; Arnesen E
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Aug; 28(2):158-67. PubMed ID: 15234697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
