These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10637460)

  • 1. Rigiscan versus snap gauge band measurements: is the extra cost justifiable?
    Chen J; Greenstein A; Sofer M; Matzkin H
    Int J Impot Res; 1999 Dec; 11(6):315-8; discussion 318. PubMed ID: 10637460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Snap-Gauge band compared to RigiScan Plus in a nocturnal penile tumescence study for evaluation of erectile dysfunction.
    Mizuno I; Fuse H; Fujiuchi Y
    Urol Int; 2003; 71(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 12845270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Axial penile buckling forces vs Rigiscan radial rigidity as a function of intracavernosal pressure: why Rigiscan does not predict functional erections in individual patients.
    Udelson D; Park K; Sadeghi-Nejad H; Salimpour P; Krane RJ; Goldstein I
    Int J Impot Res; 1999 Dec; 11(6):327-37; discusion 337-9. PubMed ID: 10637463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Snap-Gauge band versus penile rigidity in impotence assessment.
    Ellis DJ; Doghramji K; Bagley DH
    J Urol; 1988 Jul; 140(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 3379699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utility of Rigiscan and papaverine in diagnosis of erectile impotence.
    Weinberg JJ; Badlani GH
    Urology; 1988 Jun; 31(6):526-9. PubMed ID: 2453968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reply to Editorial Comments on 'Axial penile buckling forces vs Rigiscan radial rigidity as a function of intracavernosal pressure: why Rigiscan does not predict functional erections in individual patients'.
    Udelson D; Goldstein I
    Int J Impot Res; 2000 Feb; 12(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 10982306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The performance of the Rigiscan in the measurement of penile tumescence and rigidity.
    Munoz MM; Bancroft J; Marshall I
    Int J Impot Res; 1993 Jun; 5(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 8348216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Snap-gauge compared to a full nocturnal penile tumescence study for evaluation of patients with erectile impotence.
    Allen R; Brendler CB
    J Urol; 1990 Jan; 143(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 2294261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical applicability of a new tactile sensor for evaluating rigidity of the penis: a comparative study with Rigiscan.
    Kaneko S; Mizunaga M; Yachiku S; Yamaguchi O; Omata S
    Int J Urol; 1996 Sep; 3(5):379-82. PubMed ID: 8886915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nocturnal penile rigidity measured by the snap-gauge band.
    Ek A; Bradley WE; Krane RJ
    J Urol; 1983 May; 129(5):964-6. PubMed ID: 6854770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The correlation between the new RigiScan plus software and the final diagnosis in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction.
    Benet AE; Rehman J; Holcomb RG; Melman A
    J Urol; 1996 Dec; 156(6):1947-50. PubMed ID: 8911362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of RigiScan and sleep laboratory nocturnal penile tumescence in the diagnosis of organic impotence.
    Licht MR; Lewis RW; Wollan PC; Harris CD
    J Urol; 1995 Nov; 154(5):1740-3. PubMed ID: 7563336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of RigiScan and formal nocturnal penile tumescence testing in the evaluation of erectile rigidity.
    Allen RP; Smolev JK; Engel RM; Brendler CB
    J Urol; 1993 May; 149(5 Pt 2):1265-8. PubMed ID: 8479011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening assessment of penile tumescence and rigidity. Clinical test of Snap-Gauge.
    Condra M; Fenemore J; Reid K; Phillips P; Morales A; Owen J; Surridge D
    Urology; 1987 Mar; 29(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 3824719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantages and limitations of sleep-related erection and rigidity monitoring: a review.
    Qin F; Gao L; Qian S; Fu F; Yang Y; Yuan J
    Int J Impot Res; 2018 Aug; 30(4):192-201. PubMed ID: 29855552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The correlation between penile tumescence measured by the erectometer and penile rigidity by the RigiScan.
    Suzuki K; Sato Y; Horita H; Adachi H; Kato R; Hisasue S; Itoh N; Tsukamoto T
    Int J Urol; 2001 Nov; 8(11):594-8. PubMed ID: 11903684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are consecutive nightly recordings required for valid evaluation of sleep-associated erections?
    Greenstein A; Mabjeesh NJ; Sofer M; Kaver I; Matzkin H; Chen J
    Int J Impot Res; 2007; 19(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 16885991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient-reported sexual symptomatology in predicting functional and insufficient erectile capacity.
    Ackerman MD; D'Attilio JP; Rhamy RK; Antoni MH; Politano VA; Weinstein D
    Urology; 1991 Nov; 38(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 1949454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Importance of axial penile rigidity in objective evaluation of erection quality in patients with erectile dysfunction--comparison with radial rigidity.
    Mizuno I; Komiya A; Watanabe A; Fuse H
    Urol Int; 2010; 84(2):194-7. PubMed ID: 20215825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is there a role of radial rigidity in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction?
    Ku JH; Song YS; Kim ME; Lee NK; Park YH
    Int J Impot Res; 2001 Aug; 13(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 11494075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.