These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10637463)
1. Axial penile buckling forces vs Rigiscan radial rigidity as a function of intracavernosal pressure: why Rigiscan does not predict functional erections in individual patients. Udelson D; Park K; Sadeghi-Nejad H; Salimpour P; Krane RJ; Goldstein I Int J Impot Res; 1999 Dec; 11(6):327-37; discusion 337-9. PubMed ID: 10637463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reply to Editorial Comments on 'Axial penile buckling forces vs Rigiscan radial rigidity as a function of intracavernosal pressure: why Rigiscan does not predict functional erections in individual patients'. Udelson D; Goldstein I Int J Impot Res; 2000 Feb; 12(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 10982306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of RigiScan and formal nocturnal penile tumescence testing in the evaluation of erectile rigidity. Allen RP; Smolev JK; Engel RM; Brendler CB J Urol; 1993 May; 149(5 Pt 2):1265-8. PubMed ID: 8479011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Axial penile rigidity: determinants and relation to hemodynamic parameters. Goldstein I; Udelson D Int J Impot Res; 1998 May; 10 Suppl 2():S28-33; discussion S49-51. PubMed ID: 9647958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Engineering analysis of penile hemodynamic and structural-dynamic relationships: Part III--Clinical considerations of penile hemodynamic and rigidity erectile responses. Udelson D; Nehra A; Hatzichristou DG; Azadzoi K; Moreland RB; Krane RJ; Saenz de Tejada I; Goldstein I Int J Impot Res; 1998 Jun; 10(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 9647944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Normal hemodynamic parameters do not always predict the presence of a rigid erection: a quantitative assessment of functional erectile impairment. Hatzichristou DG; Hatzimouratidis K; Tzortzis V; Apostolidis A; Bekos A; Ioannidis E Int J Impot Res; 2003 Apr; 15(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 12789388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Importance of axial penile rigidity in objective evaluation of erection quality in patients with erectile dysfunction--comparison with radial rigidity. Mizuno I; Komiya A; Watanabe A; Fuse H Urol Int; 2010; 84(2):194-7. PubMed ID: 20215825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is there a role of radial rigidity in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction? Ku JH; Song YS; Kim ME; Lee NK; Park YH Int J Impot Res; 2001 Aug; 13(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 11494075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of RigiScan and sleep laboratory nocturnal penile tumescence in the diagnosis of organic impotence. Licht MR; Lewis RW; Wollan PC; Harris CD J Urol; 1995 Nov; 154(5):1740-3. PubMed ID: 7563336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rigiscan versus snap gauge band measurements: is the extra cost justifiable? Chen J; Greenstein A; Sofer M; Matzkin H Int J Impot Res; 1999 Dec; 11(6):315-8; discussion 318. PubMed ID: 10637460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Role of Nocturnal Penile Tumescence and Rigidity (NPTR) Monitoring in the Diagnosis of Psychogenic Erectile Dysfunction: A Review. Zou Z; Lin H; Zhang Y; Wang R Sex Med Rev; 2019 Jul; 7(3):442-454. PubMed ID: 30612976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Engineering analysis of penile hemodynamic and structural-dynamic relationships: Part II--Clinical implications of penile buckling. Udelson D; Nehra A; Hatzichristou DG; Azadzoi K; Moreland RB; Krane RJ; Saenz de Tejada I; Goldstein I Int J Impot Res; 1998 Mar; 10(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 9542687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical applicability of a new tactile sensor for evaluating rigidity of the penis: a comparative study with Rigiscan. Kaneko S; Mizunaga M; Yachiku S; Yamaguchi O; Omata S Int J Urol; 1996 Sep; 3(5):379-82. PubMed ID: 8886915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The performance of the Rigiscan in the measurement of penile tumescence and rigidity. Munoz MM; Bancroft J; Marshall I Int J Impot Res; 1993 Jun; 5(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 8348216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the International Index of Erectile Function erectile domain scores and nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity measurements: does one predict the other? Yang CC; Porter MP; Penson DF BJU Int; 2006 Jul; 98(1):105-9; discussion 109. PubMed ID: 16831153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Engineering analysis of penile hemodynamic and structural-dynamic relationships: Part I--Clinical implications of penile tissue mechanical properties. Udelson D; Nehra A; Hatzichristou DG; Azadzoi K; Moreland RB; Krane J; Saenz de Tejada IS; Goldstein I Int J Impot Res; 1998 Mar; 10(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 9542686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Diagnosis of penile erectile dysfunction: simultaneous recording of nocturnal penile rigidity and circumferential expansion]. Kaneko S; Mizunaga M; Miyata M; Yachiku S; Matsuda H; Sugiyama T; Park YC; Kurita T Hinyokika Kiyo; 1991 Nov; 37(11):1361-6. PubMed ID: 1767760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advanced diagnostics in erectile dysfunction: beyond the concept of hemodynamics. Pescatori ES; Drei B; Silingardi V J Endocrinol Invest; 2003; 26(3 Suppl):125-6. PubMed ID: 12834038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Digital inflection rigidometry in the study of erectile dysfunction. A new technique]. Rosselló Barbará M Arch Esp Urol; 1996 Apr; 49(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 8702341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]