These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1063753)

  • 21. Relationship between subsurface damage and wear of dental restorative composites.
    McKinney JE; Wu W
    J Dent Res; 1982 Sep; 61(9):1083-8. PubMed ID: 6963283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Restorative resins: abrasion vs. mechanical properties.
    Jørgensen KD
    Scand J Dent Res; 1980 Dec; 88(6):557-68. PubMed ID: 6941370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Localized three-body wear of resin composites.
    Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():19-27. PubMed ID: 8935090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of air polishing on contemporary esthetic restorative materials.
    Carr MP; Mitchell JC; Seghi RR; Vermilyea SG
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(3):238-41. PubMed ID: 12116510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of a leucite-containing ceramic filler on the abrasive wear of dental composites.
    Atai M; Yassini E; Amini M; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1181-7. PubMed ID: 17507087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wear and flexural strength comparisons of alumina/feldspar resin infiltrated dental composites.
    Le Roux AR; Lachman N; Walker M; Botha T
    SADJ; 2008 Nov; 63(10):544, 546-9. PubMed ID: 19322965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Versatile composite resins simplifying the practice of restorative dentistry.
    Margeas R
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014 Jan; 35(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 24571527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Post-draw PAN-PMMA nanofiber reinforced and toughened Bis-GMA dental restorative composite.
    Sun W; Cai Q; Li P; Deng X; Wei Y; Xu M; Yang X
    Dent Mater; 2010 Sep; 26(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 20579722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surface morphology and mechanical properties of new-generation flowable resin composites for dental restoration.
    Salerno M; Derchi G; Thorat S; Ceseracciu L; Ruffilli R; Barone AC
    Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1221-8. PubMed ID: 22000067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fatigue resistance of composite restorations: effect of filler content.
    Htang A; Ohsawa M; Matsumoto H
    Dent Mater; 1995 Jan; 11(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 7498610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interface effects on mechanical properties of particle-reinforced composites.
    Debnath S; Ranade R; Wunder SL; McCool J; Boberick K; Baran G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Sep; 20(7):677-86. PubMed ID: 15236943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Color stability of new composite restorative materials under accelerated aging.
    Powers JM; Fan PL; Raptis CN
    J Dent Res; 1980 Dec; 59(12):2071-4. PubMed ID: 6941995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The surface finish of the new microfill restorative materials. A scanning electron microscope study.
    Lui JL; Low T
    J Oral Rehabil; 1982 Jan; 9(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 6950073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of filler content and size on properties of composites.
    Li Y; Swartz ML; Phillips RW; Moore BK; Roberts TA
    J Dent Res; 1985 Dec; 64(12):1396-401. PubMed ID: 3001160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A new method for measuring the wear of composite restorative materials.
    Tani Y; Suzuki K; Yuasa S
    Dent Mater J; 1983 Jun; 2(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 6586342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of tooth brushing and removal of excess filling on the surface of composite restorative resins.
    Bergwall O; Brännström M; Wictorin L
    Sven Tandlak Tidskr; 1971 Jun; 64(6):347-56. PubMed ID: 5293438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols.
    Yazici AR; Müftü A; Kugel G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):9-17. PubMed ID: 17618325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An in vitro study of the effect of different restorative materials on the reliability of a veneering porcelain.
    Anderson MR; Chung KH; Flinn BD; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Dec; 110(6):521-8. PubMed ID: 24189113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations.
    Belli R; Geinzer E; Muschweck A; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
    Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 24553249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.