126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10637537)
1. Comparison of N95 disposable filtering facepiece fits using bitrex qualitative and TSI Portacount quantitative fit testing.
Clapham SJ
Int J Occup Environ Health; 2000; 6(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 10637537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Campbell DL; Jensen PA; Myers WR
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):723-30. PubMed ID: 12363214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
Duling MG; Lawrence RB; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Errors associated with three methods of assessing respirator fit.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Duling MG; Campbell DL
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Jan; 3(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 16485349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Capability of respirator wearers to detect aerosolized qualitative fit test agents (sweetener and Bitrex) with known fixed leaks.
McKay RT; Davies E
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Jun; 15(6):479-84. PubMed ID: 10853288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Campbell DL; Zhuang Z; Calvert CA; Jensen PA
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Apr; 1(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 15204866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Lee K; Slavcev A; Nicas M
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 15202153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a quantitative fit testing method for N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Janssen L; Luinenburg MD; Mullins HE; Danisch SG; Nelson TJ
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 12908863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effect on Fit of Multiple Consecutive Donning and Doffing of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.
Vuma CD; Manganyi J; Wilson K; Rees D
Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Oct; 63(8):930-936. PubMed ID: 31504129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of sampling probes for fit testing n95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Bergman MS; Viscusi DJ; Zhuang Z; Newcomb WE
Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 May; 57(4):507-18. PubMed ID: 23258452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two quantitative fit-test methods using N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Sietsema M; Brosseau LM
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016 Aug; 13(8):621-7. PubMed ID: 26963561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total inward leakage measurement of particulates for N95 filtering facepiece respirators--a comparison study.
Rengasamy S; Walbert GF; Newcomb WE; Faulkner K; Rengasamy MM; Brannen JJ; Szalajda JV
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Mar; 58(2):206-16. PubMed ID: 24107745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of multiple consecutive donnings on filtering facepiece respirator fit.
Bergman MS; Viscusi DJ; Zhuang Z; Palmiero AJ; Powell JB; Shaffer RE
Am J Infect Control; 2012 May; 40(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 21864945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fit testing respirators for public health medical emergencies.
Brosseau LM
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Nov; 7(11):628-32. PubMed ID: 20853203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative fit-testing results for three commonly used respirators in the healthcare sector.
Hon CY; Danyluk Q; Bryce E; Janssen B; Neudorf M; Yassi A; Shen H; Astrakianakis G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Mar; 14(3):175-179. PubMed ID: 27717300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the performance of the N95-companion: effects of filter penetration and comparison with other aerosol instruments.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(7):417-26. PubMed ID: 22642759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laboratory faceseal leakage evaluation of n95 filtering facepiece respirators against nanoparticles and "all size" particles.
Zhuang Z; Bergman MS; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(9):496-504. PubMed ID: 23927376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of aloe vera for qualitative fit testing of particulate respirators: a logistic regression approach.
Fakherpour A; Jahangiri M; Yousefinejad S; Seif M; Banaee S
Ind Health; 2020 Feb; 58(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 31155521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Janssen L
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Oct; 18(10):732-3; author reply 733-4. PubMed ID: 12959883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
