516 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10637690)
21. [Delegating responsibilities].
Chirurg; 2001 Dec; 72(12):suppl 336-7. PubMed ID: 11824048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Expert witness testimony: a time for self-regulation?
Weintraub MI
J Child Neurol; 1995 May; 10(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 7642905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Behavior following an incident. What can, what should, what must be done from the legal viewpoint?].
Ulsenheimer K; Bock RW
Chirurg; 1996 May; 67(5):suppl 110-4. PubMed ID: 8777875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Physician documentation responsibility. Decubitus ulcer--a forensic medicine gray zone].
Zentralbl Chir; 2009 Sep; 134(5):406-7. PubMed ID: 19787582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Our malpractice problem: perspectives of an expert witness. Interview by Karen Sandrick.
Pace W
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1994 Mar; 79(3):36-41. PubMed ID: 10132607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Preparing for deposition: quality doesn't cost, it pays.
Graves J
J Med Assoc Ga; 1993 Sep; 82(9):481-4. PubMed ID: 8228677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Expert witness testimony: An update.
Weintraub MI
Neurol Clin; 1999 May; 17(2):363-9. PubMed ID: 10196417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Protecting members and promoting safety.
O'Connor T
Nurs N Z; 1998 Sep; 4(8):22-3. PubMed ID: 10586781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Experiences with medical expert committees--procedures in physician malpractice claims].
Carstensen G
Versicherungsmedizin; 1989 Mar; 41(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 2705283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Peer review of the expert witness: an opportunity to improve our medical liability system.
Fadjo D; Bucciarelli RL
J Child Neurol; 1995 Sep; 10(5):403-4. PubMed ID: 7499761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Fault of organisation in hospital and practice].
Wienke A
Laryngorhinootologie; 2006 Aug; 85(8):589-92. PubMed ID: 16625489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Dear Dad: will this jury find me guilty of malpractice?
Cassat JD
Med Econ; 1991 May; 68(9):44-8. PubMed ID: 10110299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Practice parameters, guidelines, standard].
Ratzel R
Chirurg; 2000 Feb; 71(2):suppl 29-33. PubMed ID: 10734598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Rule-making and justice: a cautionary tale.
Brown GW
Ment Retard; 1990 Apr; 28(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 2345531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Legal malpractice problem of guidelines].
Ulsenheimer K
Versicherungsmedizin; 2001 Jun; 53(2):53-4. PubMed ID: 11411316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Whistle blowing in medicine: between the poles of informing and criminal liability].
Oehler T
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2014 Feb; 139(9):444-7. PubMed ID: 24558000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [The expert witness and his testimony].
Lippert HD
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1994 Mar; 119(13):482-4. PubMed ID: 8156873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [The surgeon's role as expert witness in malpractice lawsuits. Purpose and requirements of legal medical opinions].
Bauch J; Meier J; Ulsenheimer K
Chirurg; 2005 Dec; 76(12):1185-97; quiz 1198-9. PubMed ID: 16323031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Guidelines for expert witness testimony in medical malpractice litigation. Committee on Medical Liability. American Academy of Pediatrics.
Pediatrics; 2002 May; 109(5):974-9. PubMed ID: 11986466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The Law for Patient's Rights - Impact for the Surgeon].
Weimer T
Zentralbl Chir; 2016 Jun; 141(3):319-21. PubMed ID: 26359954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
