237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10640159)
1. Analysis of client characteristics that may affect early discontinuation of the TCu-380A IUD.
Rivera R; Chen-Mok M; McMullen S
Contraception; 1999 Sep; 60(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 10640159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical performance of the TCu 380A and Lippes Loop IUDs in three developing countries.
Farr G; Amatya R; Acosta M; Ekwempu C; Kisninci H
Contraception; 1995 Jul; 52(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8521710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interactions between intrauterine contraceptive device use and breast-feeding status at time of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion: analysis of TCu-380A acceptors in developing countries.
Farr G; Rivera R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 167(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 1442918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of two techniques used in immediate postplacental insertion (IPPI) of the Copper T-380A IUD in Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xu JX; Rivera R; Dunson TR; Zhuang LQ; Yang XL; Ma GT; Chi IC
Contraception; 1996 Jul; 54(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8804806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The comparative trial of TCu 380A IUD and progesterone-releasing vaginal ring used by lactating women.
Chen JH; Wu SC; Shao WQ; Zou MH; Hu J; Cong L; Miao L; Wang C; Dong J; Gao J; Xiao BL
Contraception; 1998 Jun; 57(6):371-9. PubMed ID: 9693396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An analysis of the personal reasons for discontinuing IUD use.
Petta CA; Amatya R; Farr G; Chi I
Contraception; 1994 Oct; 50(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 7813222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three different models of the copper T intrauterine contraceptive device.
Roy S; Casagrande J; Cooper DL; Mishell DR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jul; 134(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 453297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Twelve-month comparative multicenter study of the TCu 380A and ML 250 intrauterine devices in Bangkok, Thailand.
Reinprayoon D; Gilmore C; Farr G; Amatya R
Contraception; 1998 Oct; 58(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 9865999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices.
Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz J; Diaz MM; Faundes A; el Mahgoub S; Diaz S; Pavez M; Coutinho E; Mattos CE
Contraception; 1987 Mar; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 3111785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can intrauterine device removals for bleeding or pain be predicted at a one-month follow-up visit? A multivariate analysis.
Stanback J; Grimes D
Contraception; 1998 Dec; 58(6):357-60. PubMed ID: 10095972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. TCu 380A IUD: a reversible permanent contraceptive method in women over 35 years of age.
Bahamondes L; Faundes A; Sobreira-Lima B; Lui-Filho JF; Pecci P; Matera S
Contraception; 2005 Nov; 72(5):337-41. PubMed ID: 16246658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of the TCu 380A IUD at six Latin American centers.
Petta CA; Amatya R; Farr G
Contraception; 1994 Jul; 50(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 7924319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative clinical trial of the TCu 380A, Lippes Loop D and Multiload Cu 375 IUDs in Indonesia.
Sastrawinata S; Farr G; Prihadi SM; Hutapea H; Anwar M; Wahyudi I; Sunjoto ; Kemara KP; Champion CB; Robbins M
Contraception; 1991 Aug; 44(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 1893708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contraceptive efficacy of the Copper T 380A and Copper T 200 intrauterine devices: results from a comparative clinical trial in six developing countries.
Farr G; Amatya R
Contraception; 1994 Mar; 49(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 8200217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contraceptives for lactating women: a comparative trial of a progesterone-releasing vaginal ring and the copper T 380A IUD.
Sivin I; Díaz S; Croxatto HB; Miranda P; Shaaban M; Sayed EH; Xiao B; Wu SC; Du M; Alvarez F; Brache V; Basnayake S; McCarthy T; Lacarra M; Mishell DR; Koetsawang S; Stern J; Jackanicz T
Contraception; 1997 Apr; 55(4):225-32. PubMed ID: 9179454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical performance of the TCu 380A and TCu 220C IUDs in four developing country family planning clinics.
Farr G; Amatya R; Betancourt JD; David M; Alfonso L; Dacalos E
Contraception; 1994 Nov; 50(5):417-29. PubMed ID: 7859451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of the TCu 380A versus TCu 200 IUDs in Nepal.
Shrestha M; Hurst C; Farr G; Amatya R; Tucker B; Mcmaham J
Asia Pac Popul J; 1995 Jun; 10(2):15-26. PubMed ID: 12319865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Copper T 220C: a new long-acting copper intrauterine contraceptive device.
Cooper DL; Millen AK; Mishell DR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jan; 124(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 1247047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between two techniques used in immediate postplacental insertion of TCu 380A intrauterine device: 36-month follow-up.
Xu J; Yang X; Gu X; Xu S; Zhou X; Chen Y; Xiao Z; Zhuang L
Reprod Contracept; 1999; 10(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 12349462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
