These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10641012)
21. Emergency department response to hazardous materials incidents. Kirk MA; Cisek J; Rose SR Emerg Med Clin North Am; 1994 May; 12(2):461-81. PubMed ID: 8187692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Total allowable concentrations of monomeric inorganic aluminum and hydrated aluminum silicates in drinking water. Willhite CC; Ball GL; McLellan CJ Crit Rev Toxicol; 2012 May; 42(5):358-442. PubMed ID: 22512666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Acute inhalative exposure assessment: derivation of guideline levels with special regard to sensitive subpopulations and time scaling. Mielke H; Gundert A; Abraham K; Gundert-Remy U Toxicology; 2005 Oct; 214(3):256-67. PubMed ID: 16055256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Review of the U.S. Army's health risk assessments for oral exposure to six chemical-warfare agents. Introduction. J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2000 Mar; 59(5-6):281-526. PubMed ID: 10742829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The AETL methodology as a potential solution to current challenges associated with the development and use of acute exposure levels in Seveso II applications. Wood M; Pichard A; Gundert-Remy U; de Rooij C; Tissot SM J Hazard Mater; 2006 May; 133(1-3):8-15. PubMed ID: 16343752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Incorporation of potential for multimedia exposure into chemical hazard scores for pollution prevention. Whaley DA; Meloy TP; Barrett SS; Bedillion EJ Drug Chem Toxicol; 1999 Feb; 22(1):241-73. PubMed ID: 10189582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Enhancing the chemical mixture methodology in emergency preparedness and consequence assessment analysis. Yu XY; Glantz CS; Yao J; He H; Petrocchi AJ; Craig DK; Ciolek JT; Booth AE Toxicology; 2013 Nov; 313(2-3):174-84. PubMed ID: 23182768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Survey on methodologies in the risk assessment of chemical exposures in emergency response situations in Europe. Heinälä M; Gundert-Remy U; Wood MH; Ruijten M; Bos PM; Zitting A; Bull S; Russell D; Nielsen E; Cassel G; Leffler P; Tissot S; Vincent JM; Santonen T J Hazard Mater; 2013 Jan; 244-245():545-54. PubMed ID: 23260870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Emergency planning and the Control of Major Accident Hazards (COMAH/Seveso II) Directive: an approach to determine the public safety zone for toxic cloud releases. O'Mahony MT; Doolan D; O'Sullivan A; Hession M J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jun; 154(1-3):355-65. PubMed ID: 18078713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Determination of acute exposure guideline levels in a dispersion model. Stage SA J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Jan; 54(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 14871012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Threshold limit values, permissible exposure limits, and feasibility: the bases for exposure limits in the United States. Rappaport SM Am J Ind Med; 1993 May; 23(5):683-94. PubMed ID: 8506846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Providing citizens with information about health effects of hazardous chemicals. Hadden SG J Occup Med; 1989 Jun; 31(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 2732817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The application of toxicological parameters in emergency response and planning. Wiener RK; Shaver DK Toxicol Lett; 1989 Dec; 49(2-3):361-8. PubMed ID: 2690410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hospital response to chemical terrorism: personal protective equipment, training, and operations planning. Georgopoulos PG; Fedele P; Shade P; Lioy PJ; Hodgson M; Longmire A; Sands M; Brown MA Am J Ind Med; 2004 Nov; 46(5):432-45. PubMed ID: 15490471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Discrepancy among acute guideline levels for emergency response. Öberg M; Palmen N; Johanson G J Hazard Mater; 2010 Dec; 184(1-3):439-447. PubMed ID: 20851517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors. Colombini D; Occhipinti E Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 44(4):436-438. PubMed ID: 29961081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A tale of two limits. Weinrich AJ Occup Health Saf; 1999 May; 68(5):56, 60, 62 passim. PubMed ID: 10231971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Organic acids and bases: review of toxicological studies. Leung HW; Paustenbach DJ Am J Ind Med; 1990; 18(6):717-35. PubMed ID: 2264570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]