These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10641272)

  • 21. Chemical characteristics and volatile profile of genetically modified peanut cultivars.
    Ng EC; Dunford NT; Chenault K
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2008 Oct; 106(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 19000610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Medical and biological assessment of the safety of genetically modified corn lines MON 810 and GA 21: a toxicological-biochemical study].
    Tutel'ian VA; Kravchenko LV; Sorokina EIu; Korolev AA; Avren'eva LI; Guseva GV; Chernysheva ON; Tyshko NV
    Vopr Pitan; 2001; 70(3):28-31. PubMed ID: 11517687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Consumer perception of risk associated with eating genetically engineered soybeans is less in the presence of a perceived consumer benefit.
    Brown JL; Ping Y
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2003 Feb; 103(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 12589328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Concern about Japan's unclear biotech regulations.
    Watanabe KN
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):689. PubMed ID: 12610594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Food firms test fry Pioneer's trans fat-free soybean oil.
    Waltz E
    Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Aug; 28(8):769-70. PubMed ID: 20697388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative safety testing of genetically modified foods in a 90-day rat feeding study design allowing the distinction between primary and secondary effects of the new genetic event.
    Knudsen I; Poulsen M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Oct; 49(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 17719159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Rapid analysis of genetically modified soybean by a duplex PCR-capillary electrophoresis system with laser-induced fluorescence detection].
    Zhou Y; Li YQ; Su N; Pei XF; Yong L
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2005 Jan; 36(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 15702799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A proteomic study to identify soya allergens--the human response to transgenic versus non-transgenic soya samples.
    Batista R; Martins I; Jeno P; Ricardo CP; Oliveira MM
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2007; 144(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 17496424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A 90-day safety study in Wistar rats fed genetically modified rice expressing snowdrop lectin Galanthus nivalis (GNA).
    Poulsen M; Kroghsbo S; Schrøder M; Wilcks A; Jacobsen H; Miller A; Frenzel T; Danier J; Rychlik M; Shu Q; Emami K; Sudhakar D; Gatehouse A; Engel KH; Knudsen I
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Mar; 45(3):350-63. PubMed ID: 17052828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of genetically modified organisms.
    Yoke-Kqueen C; Radu S
    J Biotechnol; 2006 Dec; 127(1):161-6. PubMed ID: 16860900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Plant genetic engineering in Monsanto company: from the first laboratory experiments to worldwide practical use].
    Konov AL; Velchev M; Parcel D
    Tsitol Genet; 2005; 39(3):3-12. PubMed ID: 16250241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the genomic DNA extracted from GMO and non-GMO foodstuffs with four different extraction methods.
    Peano C; Samson MC; Palmieri L; Gulli M; Marmiroli N
    J Agric Food Chem; 2004 Nov; 52(23):6962-8. PubMed ID: 15537304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative evaluation of different DNA extraction procedures from food samples.
    Di Bernardo G; Del Gaudio S; Galderisi U; Cascino A; Cipollaro M
    Biotechnol Prog; 2007; 23(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 17286386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genetically modified organisms in the United States: implementation, concerns, and public perception.
    Oeschger MP; Silva CE
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():57-68. PubMed ID: 17522820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of soybean to study root biology.
    Kereszt A; Li D; Indrasumunar A; Nguyen CD; Nontachaiyapoom S; Kinkema M; Gresshoff PM
    Nat Protoc; 2007; 2(4):948-52. PubMed ID: 17446894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biotechnology and food safety.
    Kopchick JJ
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1992 Jul; 201(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 1500314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Knowledge, attitudes towards and acceptability of genetic modification in Germany.
    Christoph IB; Bruhn M; Roosen J
    Appetite; 2008 Jul; 51(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 18243411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genetically modified crops: success, safety assessment, and public concern.
    Singh OV; Ghai S; Paul D; Jain RK
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 71(5):598-607. PubMed ID: 16639559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Approaches in the risk assessment of genetically modified foods by the Hellenic Food Safety Authority.
    Varzakas TH; Chryssochoidis G; Argyropoulos D
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):530-42. PubMed ID: 17275157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of a real-time PCR method based on duplo target plasmids for determining an unexpected genetically modified soybean intermix with feed components.
    Dalla Costa L; Martinelli L
    J Agric Food Chem; 2007 Feb; 55(4):1264-73. PubMed ID: 17300150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.