BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10641300)

  • 1. Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders.
    Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Lalli JS; Daniel D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):451-66. PubMed ID: 10641300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality.
    Neef NA; Mace FC; Shade D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 8473257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Krug A
    Behav Modif; 2000 Jan; 24(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 10641365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancing tolerance to delayed reinforcers: the role of intervening activities.
    Dixon MR; Rehfeldt RA; Randich L
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(2):263-6. PubMed ID: 12858992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using pictures to assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Graff RB; Gibson L
    Behav Modif; 2003 Sep; 27(4):470-83. PubMed ID: 12971123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps.
    Dyer K; Dunlap G; Winterling V
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 2074240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-control: teaching tolerance for delay in impulsive children.
    Schweitzer JB; Sulzer-Azaroff B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Sep; 50(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 3193054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using a self-control training procedure to increase appropriate behavior.
    Dixon MR; Hayes LJ; Binder LM; Manthey S; Sigman C; Zdanowski DM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 9652100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.
    Glover AC; Roane HS; Kadey HJ; Grow LL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 18595281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of reinforcer quality on behavioral momentum: coordinated applied and basic research.
    Mace FC; Mauro BC; Boyajian AE; Eckert TL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 9157095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of reinforcer preference on functional analysis outcomes.
    Lalli JS; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 9532752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parametric analysis of delayed primary and conditioned reinforcers.
    Leon Y; Borrero JC; DeLeon IG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):639-55. PubMed ID: 27174440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-control in children with autism: response allocation during delays to reinforcement.
    Dixon MR; Cummings A
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):491-5. PubMed ID: 11800188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of a response bias for aggression over functionally equivalent appropriate behavior.
    DeLeon IG; Fisher WW; Herman KM; Crosland KC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 10738953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirically derived consequences: a data-based method for prescribing treatments for destructive behavior.
    Fisher W; Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Hagopian LP; Langdon NA
    Res Dev Disabil; 1994; 15(2):133-49. PubMed ID: 8085030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.
    Bowman LG; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Kogan JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 9316258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of free-time contingencies as positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Zarcone JR; Fisher WW; Piazza CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 8682741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concurrent reinforcement schedules: behavior change and maintenance without extinction.
    Hoch H; McComas JJ; Thompson AL; Paone D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12102135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Choice-making treatment of young children's severe behavior problems.
    Peck SM; Wacker DP; Berg WK; Cooper LJ; Brown KA; Richman D; McComas JJ; Frischmeyer P; Millard T
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(3):263-90. PubMed ID: 8810061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.