162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10641662)
1. Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing.
Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):538-46. PubMed ID: 10641662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907. PubMed ID: 12083223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spectral and threshold effects on recognition of speech at higher-than-normal levels.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):310-20. PubMed ID: 16875228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.
Studebaker GA; Sherbecoe RL; McDaniel DM; Gwaltney CA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Apr; 105(4):2431-44. PubMed ID: 10212424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Word recognition within a linguistic context: effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability, and cognitive function.
Benichov J; Cox LC; Tun PA; Wingfield A
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 21918453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Word recognition in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores and increases in masking.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):914-22. PubMed ID: 16158647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recognition of filtered words in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores with and without increases in masking.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):923-33. PubMed ID: 16158648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of auditory temporal resolution in school-age children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise.
Stuart A
Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 15692306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with equivalent masked thresholds.
Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1165-74. PubMed ID: 7876438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers.
Humes LE; Dirks DD; Bell TS; Kincaid GE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):765-73. PubMed ID: 3584685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
