135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1064227)
1. Doyne Memorial Lecture, 1975. Correlation of optic nerve and visual field defects in simple glaucoma.
Drance SM
Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K (1962); 1975 Jul; 95(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 1064227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of blue-on-yellow visual fields with scanning confocal laser optic disc measurements.
Teesalu P; Vihanninjoki K; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A; Läärä E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Nov; 38(12):2452-9. PubMed ID: 9375562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between intraocular pressure level and optic disc changes in high-tension glaucoma suspects.
Tanito M; Itai N; Dong J; Ohira A; Chihara E
Ophthalmology; 2003 May; 110(5):915-21. PubMed ID: 12750089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discriminating between normal and glaucoma-damaged eyes with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.
Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pajarín AB; Honrubia FM
Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):775-781.e2. PubMed ID: 17870171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glaucomatous visual field defects: their characteristics and how to detect them.
Kitazawa Y; Yamamoto T
Clin Neurosci; 1997; 4(5):279-83. PubMed ID: 9292256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of optic nerve head topography and visual field in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.
Boland MV; Zhang L; Broman AT; Jampel HD; Quigley HA
Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):239-245.e2. PubMed ID: 18082888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between optic disc topography and retinal nerve fibre layer measurements in glaucoma.
Magacho L; Marcondes AM; Costa VP
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Jun; 83(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 15948785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short-wavelength automated perimetry can predict glaucomatous standard visual field loss by ten years.
Sit AJ; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN
Semin Ophthalmol; 2004; 19(3-4):122-4. PubMed ID: 15590553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ranking of optic disc variables for detection of glaucomatous optic nerve damage.
Jonas JB; Bergua A; Schmitz-Valckenberg P; Papastathopoulos KI; Budde WM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1764-73. PubMed ID: 10845597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between optic disc changes and visual field defects in chronic open-angle glaucoma.
Drance SM
Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1976; 81(2):224-6. PubMed ID: 936394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of visual function with optic nerve and nerve fiber layer structure in glaucoma.
Caprioli J
Surv Ophthalmol; 1989 Feb; 33 Suppl():319-30. PubMed ID: 2655145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Visual field in early glaucoma and the correlation of optic disc changes with visual field defects].
Chen XM
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1987 Jan; 23(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 3113870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Methods for screening the visual field for glaucoma].
Volkov VV
Vestn Oftalmol; 1998; 114(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9584628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of catch trial methods used in standard automated perimetry in glaucoma patients.
Wall M; Doyle CK; Brito CF; Woodward KR; Johnson CA
J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):626-30. PubMed ID: 19092457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals.
Pierre-Filho Pde T; Schimiti RB; de Vasconcellos JP; Costa VP
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16704696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regional correlation of structure and function in glaucoma, using the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, and visual fields.
Danesh-Meyer HV; Ku JY; Papchenko TL; Jayasundera T; Hsiang JC; Gamble GD
Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):603-11. PubMed ID: 16483660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of age, sex, race, refractive error and optic disc parameters on the sensitivity and specificity of scanning laser polarimetry.
Costa VP; Lauande-Pimentel R; Fonseca RA; Magacho L
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Aug; 82(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 15291935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
