BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10642425)

  • 1. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis II: including discordant relative pairs in the study.
    Guo X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):111-27. PubMed ID: 10642425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis I: use of the mean statistic for affected sib pairs.
    Guo X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 10642424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the total expected study cost in two-stage genome-wide search designs for linkage analysis using the mean test for affected sib pairs.
    Ziegler A; Böddeker I; Geller F; Müller HH; Guo X
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 20(3):397-400. PubMed ID: 11255247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Haseman and Elston revisited.
    Elston RC; Buxbaum S; Jacobs KB; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 10861893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semiparametric linkage analysis using pseudolikelihoods on neighbouring sets.
    Li H; Huang J
    Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Jul; 62(Pt 4):323-36. PubMed ID: 9924610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.
    Cordell HJ; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model-free sib-pair linkage analysis: combining full-sib and half-sib pairs.
    Schaid DJ; Elston RC; Tran L; Wilson AF
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 10861895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing association and linkage using affected-sib-parent study designs.
    Millstein J; Siegmund KD; Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 29(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 16121357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Powerful designs for genetic association studies that consider twins and sibling pairs with discordant genotypes.
    Wessel J; Schork AJ; Tiwari HK; Schork NJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 31(7):789-96. PubMed ID: 17549743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility of half-sibling designs for detecting a genetic component to a disease.
    Tierney C; Merikangas KR; Risch N
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(6):523-38. PubMed ID: 7713393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis using pairs of affected relatives.
    Elston RC; Guo X; Williams LV
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(6):535-58. PubMed ID: 8968713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ASP--a simulation-based power calculator for genetic linkage studies of qualitative traits, using sib-pairs.
    Krawczak M
    Hum Genet; 2001 Dec; 109(6):675-7. PubMed ID: 11810280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modifier genes in humans: strategies for identification.
    Houlston RS; Tomlinson IP
    Eur J Hum Genet; 1998 Jan; 6(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 9781018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative risks and effective number of meioses: a unified approach for general genetic models and phenotypes.
    Kurbasic A; Hössjer O
    Ann Hum Genet; 2006 Nov; 70(Pt 6):907-22. PubMed ID: 17044865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of two-stage genetic designs where data are combined using an accurate and efficient approximation for Pearson's statistic.
    Bukszár J; van den Oord EJ
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1132-7. PubMed ID: 17156288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
    Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-Stage sampling designs for gene association studies.
    Thomas D; Xie R; Gebregziabher M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):401-14. PubMed ID: 15543639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genotypic association analysis using discordant-relative-pairs.
    Yan T; Yang YN; Cheng X; DeAngelis MM; Hoh J; Zhang H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 19040657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An extended genome scan in 442 Canadian multiple sclerosis-affected sibships: a report from the Canadian Collaborative Study Group.
    Dyment DA; Sadovnick AD; Willer CJ; Armstrong H; Cader ZM; Wiltshire S; Kalman B; Risch N; Ebers GC;
    Hum Mol Genet; 2004 May; 13(10):1005-15. PubMed ID: 15069025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Including sampling and phenotyping costs into the optimization of two stage designs for genomewide association studies.
    Müller HH; Pahl R; Schäfer H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):844-52. PubMed ID: 17549751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.