These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10642458)

  • 1. Attendance to cervical cancer screening in family practices in The Netherlands.
    Hermens RP; Tacken MA; Hulscher ME; Braspenning JC; Grol RP
    Prev Med; 2000 Jan; 30(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10642458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary results of a general practice based call system for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands.
    Palm BT; Kant AC; van den Bosch WJ; Vooijs GP; van Weel C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):503-6. PubMed ID: 8312021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance].
    de Nooijer DP; de Waart FG; van Leeuwen AW; Spijker WW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Oct; 149(42):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16261714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
    Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
    Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for cervical carcinoma.
    van Leeuwen AW; de Nooijer P; Hop WC
    Cancer; 2005 Oct; 105(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 15937918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marrying research, clinical practice and cervical screening in Australian Aboriginal women in western New South Wales, Australia.
    Read CM; Bateson DJ
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(2):1117. PubMed ID: 19459723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer.
    Eaker S; Adami HO; Granath F; Wilander E; Sparén P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Mar; 13(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 15006907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
    Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
    East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
    Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strategies for the implementation of cervical and breast cancer screening of women by primary care physicians.
    Kupets R; Covens A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Nov; 83(2):186-97. PubMed ID: 11606071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Family physicians' initiative to increase compliance with screening mammography--an innovative community project.
    Eilat-Tsanani S; Sorek M; Gay N; Chaimovitch O; Kulton L; Tabenkin H
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2001 Dec; 3(12):920-4. PubMed ID: 11794915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reasons women do not attend screening for cervical cancer: a population-based study in Sweden.
    Eaker S; Adami HO; Sparén P
    Prev Med; 2001 Jun; 32(6):482-91. PubMed ID: 11394952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Women's perceptions and social barriers determine compliance to cervical screening: results from a population based study in India.
    Basu P; Sarkar S; Mukherjee S; Ghoshal M; Mittal S; Biswas S; Mandal R; Sankaranarayanan R
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 16963194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical cancer screening and management practices among providers in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP).
    Saraiya M; Irwin KL; Carlin L; Chen X; Jain N; Benard V; Montano DE
    Cancer; 2007 Sep; 110(5):1024-32. PubMed ID: 17628488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adherence to cervical and breast cancer programs is crucial to improving screening performance.
    Mauad EC; Nicolau SM; Moreira LF; Haikel RL; Longatto-Filho A; Baracat EC
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1241. PubMed ID: 19778158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CAPRELA (Cancer Prevention for Latinas): findings of a pilot study in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County.
    Koval AE; Riganti AA; Foley KL
    N C Med J; 2006; 67(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16550986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical cancer screening in Serbia.
    Kesić V; Jovićević-Bekić A; Vujnović M
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():31-6. PubMed ID: 17598502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adherence to guidelines on cervical cancer screening in general practice: programme elements of successful implementation.
    Hermens RP; Hak E; Hulscher ME; Braspenning JC; Grol RP
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Nov; 51(472):897-903. PubMed ID: 11761203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can you use a sequential sample of patients as a substitute for a full practice audit?: Study of mammography screening rates in 20 family practices in Ontario.
    Swanson G; Kaczorowski J
    Can Fam Physician; 2008 Oct; 54(10):1436-7, 1437.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18854475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.