118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10642726)
1. Elastic matching of dynamic MR mammographic images.
Lucht R; Knopp MV; Brix G
Magn Reson Med; 2000 Jan; 43(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 10642726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploiting sparsity in x-f space for higher spatiotemporal resolution in breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI.
Usman M; Ramsay EA; Siegler P; Plewes DB; Chan RW
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S171-3. PubMed ID: 23083578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimized density-weighted imaging for dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D-MR mammography.
Gutberlet M; Roth A; Hahn D; Köstler H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Feb; 33(2):328-39. PubMed ID: 21274974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling.
Lee AW; Rajagopal V; Babarenda Gamage TP; Doyle AJ; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1256-64. PubMed ID: 23860392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative evaluation of free-form deformation registration for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Tanner C; Schnabel JA; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ; Degenhard A; Leach MO; Hose DR; Hall-Craggs MA; Usiskin SI
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17500454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Self-organizing neural networks for automatic detection and classification of contrast (media) enhancement of lesions in dynamic MR-mammography].
Vomweg TW; Teifke A; Kauczor HU; Achenbach T; Rieker O; Schreiber WG; Heitmann KR; Beier T; Thelen M
Rofo; 2005 May; 177(5):703-13. PubMed ID: 15871086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics.
Chen W; Giger ML; Lan L; Bick U
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1076-82. PubMed ID: 15191295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Kinetic characterization of non-mass lesions on breast MRI using manual and computer assisted methods.
Vag T; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S177-8. PubMed ID: 23083580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast MR segmentation and lesion detection with cellular neural networks and 3D template matching.
Ertaş G; Gülçür HO; Osman O; Uçan ON; Tunaci M; Dursun M
Comput Biol Med; 2008 Jan; 38(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 17854795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI.
Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U; Newstead GM
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2878-87. PubMed ID: 16964864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multilevel analysis of spatiotemporal association features for differentiation of tumor enhancement patterns in breast DCE-MRI.
Lee SH; Kim JH; Cho N; Park JS; Yang Z; Jung YS; Moon WK
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):3940-56. PubMed ID: 20879557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of rigid and elastic matching of dynamic magnetic resonance mammographic images by mutual information.
Brückner T; Lucht R; Brix G
Med Phys; 2000 Oct; 27(10):2456-61. PubMed ID: 11099216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Co-registration of MR-mammography and X-ray mammography.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Hopp T; Ruiter NV; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S27-9. PubMed ID: 23083591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Quantitative parametric analysis of contrast-enhanced lesions in dynamic MR mammography].
Hauth EA; Jaeger H; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Forsting M
Radiologe; 2008 Jun; 48(6):593-600. PubMed ID: 18004537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A complete software application for automatic registration of x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance images.
Solves-Llorens JA; Rupérez MJ; Monserrat C; Feliu E; García M; Lloret M
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081903. PubMed ID: 25086534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of gadoteric acid and gadobutrol for detection as well as morphologic and dynamic characterization of lesions on breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Renz DM; Durmus T; Böttcher J; Taupitz M; Diekmann F; Huppertz A; Pfeil A; Maurer MH; Streitparth F; Bick U; Hamm B; Fallenberg EM
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):474-84. PubMed ID: 24637587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast MR for intraductal masses.
Harms SE; Harms DE; Pope K; Grear D; Smith-Foley S; Johnson K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S59-60. PubMed ID: 23083603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Accelerated breast MRI with compressed sensing.
Hargreaves BA; Saranathan M; Sung K; Daniel BL
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S54-5. PubMed ID: 23083601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
