These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10643025)

  • 1. [Conventional dental radiography and future prospectives].
    Youssefzadeh S; Gahleitner A; Bernhart D; Bernhart T
    Radiologe; 1999 Dec; 39(12):1018-26. PubMed ID: 10643025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Radiologic exposure of the dental patient: comparison of the doses delivered by different techniques].
    Jones P; Reychler H; Engels H; Wambersie A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2007; 62(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 18506961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A comparison between endoral radiography and electronic magnification of digital orthopantomography].
    Nessi R; Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Blanc M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 7501826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital panoramic and extraoral imaging.
    Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 37(4):541-51. PubMed ID: 8224331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conventional dental radiology: what the general radiologist needs to know.
    Bernaerts A; Vanhoenacker FM; Geenen L; Quisquater G; Parizel PM
    JBR-BTR; 2006; 89(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 16607874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
    Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dose exposure from analog and digital full mouth radiography and panoramic radiography].
    Kiefer H; Lambrecht JT; Roth J
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2004; 114(7):687-93. PubMed ID: 15360104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital radiography: an overview.
    Parks ET; Williamson GF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2002 Nov; 3(4):23-39. PubMed ID: 12444400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An update on dental imaging.
    Whaites E; Brown J
    Br Dent J; 1998 Aug; 185(4):166-72. PubMed ID: 9769550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Depth of occlusal caries assessed clinically, by conventional film radiographs, and by digitized, processed radiographs.
    Wenzel A; Fejerskov O; Kidd E; Joyston-Bechal S; Groeneveld A
    Caries Res; 1990; 24(5):327-33. PubMed ID: 2261604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dental digital radiography.
    Moore WS
    Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 12046403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation doses of commonly used dental radiographic surveys.
    Freeman JP; Brand JW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Mar; 77(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 8170662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spanning the Horizon of Accuracy of Different Intraoral Radiographic Modalities: A Systematic Review.
    Muchhal M; Niraj LK; Chaudhary D; Ali I; Dhama K; Patthi B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Dec; 18(12):1206-1212. PubMed ID: 29208800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The subjective image quality of conventional and digital panoramic radiography among 6 to 10 year old children.
    Makris N; Tsiklakis K; Alexiou KE; Vierrou AM; Stefaniotis T
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 17315805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; White SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1237-43. PubMed ID: 18762634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
    Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation dose-reduction techniques in North American dental schools.
    Geist JR; Katz JO
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Apr; 93(4):496-505. PubMed ID: 12029291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.