These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10644103)
1. Evaluation of pectoralis major muscle in patients with posterior breast tumors on breast MR images: early experience. Morris EA; Schwartz LH; Drotman MB; Kim SJ; Tan LK; Liberman L; Abramson AF; Van Zee KJ; Dershaw DD Radiology; 2000 Jan; 214(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 10644103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast lesion localization: a freehand, interactive MR imaging-guided technique. Daniel BL; Birdwell RL; Ikeda DM; Jeffrey SS; Black JW; Block WF; Sawyer-Glover AM; Glover GH; Herfkens RJ Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):455-63. PubMed ID: 9577495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical usefulness of MR imaging of the breast in the evaluation of the problematic mammogram. Lee CH; Smith RC; Levine JA; Troiano RN; Tocino I AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Nov; 173(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 10541112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR imaging of the breast in patients with occult primary breast carcinoma. Morris EA; Schwartz LH; Dershaw DD; van Zee KJ; Abramson AF; Liberman L Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):437-40. PubMed ID: 9356625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical MR mammography: impact of hormonal status on background enhancement and diagnostic accuracy. Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Camara O; Pfleiderer SO; Kaiser WA Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 21318935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging. Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer. Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0 T MR mammography]. Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Bredl T; Perlet C; Künzer I; Lebeau A; Untch M; Reiser M Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 9376552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ. Soderstrom CE; Harms SE; Copit DS; Evans WP; Savino DA; Krakos PA; Farrell RS; Flamig DP Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):427-32. PubMed ID: 8888235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions. Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging breast vascular maps: association between invasive cancer and ipsilateral increased vascularity. Sardanelli F; Iozzelli A; Fausto A; Carriero A; Kirchin MA Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):791-7. PubMed ID: 15845796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI? Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Diagnosis of intraductal spread of breast cancer by high-resolution MR imaging: correlation between MR imaging and pathohistological findings]. Date S Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Apr; 58(5):212-20. PubMed ID: 9617156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic MR-mammography at 1.5 T]. Fischer U; Westerhof JP; Brinck U; Korabiowska M; Schauer A; Grabbe E Rofo; 1996 Apr; 164(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 8645861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with breast implants after cancer surgery. Boné B; Aspelin P; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7710787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feature extraction and classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted breast image data. Torheim G; Godtliebsen F; Axelson D; Kvistad KA; Haraldseth O; Rinck PA IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1293-301. PubMed ID: 11811829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Kinetic characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in dynamic breast MRI using computer-assisted analysis. Vag T; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Benndorf M; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):955-61. PubMed ID: 20942728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]