These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10644946)

  • 1. The distribution of structures in evolving protein populations.
    Taverna DM; Goldstein RA
    Biopolymers; 2000 Jan; 53(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 10644946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of alphabet size and foldability requirements on protein structure designability.
    Buchler NE; Goldstein RA
    Proteins; 1999 Jan; 34(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 10336377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Designability of protein structures: a lattice-model study using the Miyazawa-Jernigan matrix.
    Li H; Tang C; Wingreen NS
    Proteins; 2002 Nov; 49(3):403-12. PubMed ID: 12360530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulating protein evolution in sequence and structure space.
    Xia Y; Levitt M
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2004 Apr; 14(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 15093835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protein designability analysis in sequence principal component space using 2D lattice model.
    Li ZR; Han X; Liu GR
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Oct; 76(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 15313539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing folding codes for proteins and polymers.
    Chan HS; Dill KA
    Proteins; 1996 Mar; 24(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 8778780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlations between designability and various structural characteristics of protein lattice models.
    Yang JY; Yu ZG; Anh V
    J Chem Phys; 2007 May; 126(19):195101. PubMed ID: 17523837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accurate prediction for atomic-level protein design and its application in diversifying the near-optimal sequence space.
    Fromer M; Yanover C
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):682-705. PubMed ID: 19003998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical origins of protein superfamilies.
    Zeldovich KB; Berezovsky IN; Shakhnovich EI
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Apr; 357(4):1335-43. PubMed ID: 16483605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast.
    Bloom JD; Drummond DA; Arnold FH; Wilke CO
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Sep; 23(9):1751-61. PubMed ID: 16782762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Understanding the role of the topology in protein folding by computational inverse folding experiments.
    Mucherino A; Costantini S; di Serafino D; D'Apuzzo M; Facchiano A; Colonna G
    Comput Biol Chem; 2008 Aug; 32(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 18479970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between energy distribution and fold stability: Insights from molecular dynamics simulations of native and mutant proteins.
    Morra G; Colombo G
    Proteins; 2008 Aug; 72(2):660-72. PubMed ID: 18247351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of sequence-reactivity space for protein-protein interactions.
    Li J; Yi Z; Laskowski MC; Laskowski M; Bailey-Kellogg C
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(3):661-71. PubMed ID: 15624216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Designability and disease.
    Wong P; Frishman D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 484():491-504. PubMed ID: 18592197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Connectivity of neutral networks, overdispersion, and structural conservation in protein evolution.
    Bastolla U; Porto M; Eduardo Roman MH; Vendruscolo MH
    J Mol Evol; 2003 Mar; 56(3):243-54. PubMed ID: 12612828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Population dynamics simulations of functional model proteins.
    Blackburne BP; Hirst JD
    J Chem Phys; 2005 Oct; 123(15):154907. PubMed ID: 16252972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hydrophobic moments of protein structures: spatially profiling the distribution.
    Silverman BD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Apr; 98(9):4996-5001. PubMed ID: 11309489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the probabilities for evolutionary structural changes in protein folds.
    Viksna J; Gilbert D
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 23(7):832-41. PubMed ID: 17282999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protein structure comparison: implications for the nature of 'fold space', and structure and function prediction.
    Kolodny R; Petrey D; Honig B
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2006 Jun; 16(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 16678402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protein structure prediction based on sequence similarity.
    Jaroszewski L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 569():129-56. PubMed ID: 19623489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.