400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10645192)
1. The effect of region of interest selection on dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of the calcaneus in 55 post-menopausal women.
Kang C; Speller R
Br J Radiol; 1999 Sep; 72(861):864-71. PubMed ID: 10645192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of ultrasound and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in the calcaneus.
Kang C; Speller R
Br J Radiol; 1998 Aug; 71(848):861-7. PubMed ID: 9828799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk.
Frediani B; Acciai C; Falsetti P; Baldi F; Filippou G; Siagkri C; Spreafico A; Galeazzi M; Marcolongo R
Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Oct; 79(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 16969597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular bone mineral density measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: relationship to hip bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound at calcaneus and hand phalanges.
Pluskiewicz W; Tarnawska B; Drozdzowska B
Br J Radiol; 2000 Mar; 73(867):288-92. PubMed ID: 10817045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association between bone mineral densities and serum lipid profiles of pre- and post-menopausal rural women in South Korea.
Cui LH; Shin MH; Chung EK; Lee YH; Kweon SS; Park KS; Choi JS
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1975-81. PubMed ID: 16167087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone mineral density measurement in the calcaneus with DXL: comparison with hip and spine measurements in a cross-sectional study of an elderly female population.
Salminen H; Sääf M; Ringertz H; Strender LE
Osteoporos Int; 2005 May; 16(5):541-51. PubMed ID: 15448984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture.
Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1435-40. PubMed ID: 7992742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur.
Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR
Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone mineral density, hip bone geometry, and calcaneus trabecular bone texture in obese and normal-weight children.
Rocher E; El Hage R; Chappard C; Portier H; Rochefort GY; Benhamou CL
J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 23473958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [X-ray densitometry and ultrasonography of the heel bone--sensitivity and comparison with densitometry of the axial skeleton].
Michalská D; Zikán V; Stĕpán J; Weichetová M; Kubová V; Krenková J; Masatová A
Cas Lek Cesk; 2000 Apr; 139(8):231-6. PubMed ID: 10916211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of bone mass in forearm, lumbar vertebra and hip by single and/or dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Qin M; Lin S; Song Z; Tian J; Chen F; Yan H; Ge Q
Chin Med Sci J; 1999 Jun; 14(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 12901622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of women with reduced bone density at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using BMD at the os calcis.
Fordham JN; Chinn DJ; Kumar N
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(9):797-802. PubMed ID: 11148807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longitudinal changes in mandibular bone mineral density compared with hip bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound at calcaneus and hand phalanges.
Drozdzowska B; Pluskiewicz W
Br J Radiol; 2002 Sep; 75(897):743-7. PubMed ID: 12200243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone mineral density of total body, spine, and femoral neck in children and young adults: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.
Lu PW; Briody JN; Ogle GD; Morley K; Humphries IR; Allen J; Howman-Giles R; Sillence D; Cowell CT
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Sep; 9(9):1451-8. PubMed ID: 7817830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss.
Nguyen TV; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9240735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in determining bone mineral density and content of various skeletal sites.
Sievänen H; Oja P; Vuori I
J Nucl Med; 1992 Jun; 33(6):1137-42. PubMed ID: 1597729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of broadband ultrasound attenuation to single X-ray absorptiometry measurements at the calcaneus in postmenopausal women.
Salamone LM; Krall EA; Harris S; Dawson-Hughes B
Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Feb; 54(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 8012876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevalence of low bone mass in postmenopausal Kuwaiti women residents in the largest province of Kuwait.
Al-Shoumer KA; Nair V
Arch Osteoporos; 2012; 7():147-53. PubMed ID: 23225292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans.
Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Lewiecki EM; Miller P; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 16823544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of anthropometric parameters and bone size on bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual X-ray absorptiometry at the hip.
Guglielmi G; van Kuijk C; Li J; Meta MD; Scillitani A; Lang TF
Acta Radiol; 2006 Jul; 47(6):574-80. PubMed ID: 16875335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]