These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10645391)

  • 1. The influence of heterophoria measurements on subsequent associated phoria measurement in a refractive routine.
    Brautaset RL; Jennings JA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 Jul; 19(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 10645391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of and comparisons among methods of measuring dissociated phoria.
    Schroeder TL; Rainey BB; Goss DA; Grosvenor TP
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 73(6):389-97. PubMed ID: 8807650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An enhancement to the Maddox Wing test for the reliable measurement of horizontal heterophoria.
    Pointer JS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):446-51. PubMed ID: 16101952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of heterophoria and phoria adaptation using an automated objective system compared to clinical methods.
    Han SJ; Guo Y; Granger-Donetti B; Vicci VR; Alvarez TL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jan; 30(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 19682268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism?
    Otto JM; Kromeier M; Bach M; Kommerell G
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 May; 246(5):631-9. PubMed ID: 18379816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison between dissociated and associated heterophoria].
    Kromeier M; Schmitt C; Bach M; Kommerell G
    Ophthalmologe; 2002 Jul; 99(7):549-54. PubMed ID: 12148302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interexaminer repeatability of a new, modified prentice card compared with established phoria tests.
    Wong EP; Fricke TR; Dinardo C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 79(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 12086303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.
    Karania R; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):507-22. PubMed ID: 16918777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of near heterophoria tests under varying conditions on an adult sample.
    Lam AK; Lam A; Charm J; Wong KM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Mar; 25(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 15713208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison, within-session repeatability and normative data of three phoria tests.
    Facchin A; Maffioletti S
    J Optom; 2021; 14(3):263-274. PubMed ID: 32763127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring the heterophoria: Agreement between two methods in non-presbyopic and presbyopic patients.
    Cantó-Cerdán M; Cacho-Martínez P; García-Muñoz Á
    J Optom; 2018; 11(3):153-159. PubMed ID: 29198488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Do prism corrections according to H.-J. Haase affect ocular prevalence?].
    Schroth V; Jaschinski W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Jan; 224(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 17260317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The forced vergence cover test and phoria adaptation.
    Toole AJ; Fogt N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Sep; 27(5):461-72. PubMed ID: 17718885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How good is the estimated cover test at predicting the von Graefe phoria measurement?
    Calvin H; Rupnow P; Grosvenor T
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Nov; 73(11):701-6. PubMed ID: 8950752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-examiner repeatability of heterophoria tests.
    Rainey BB; Schroeder TL; Goss DA; Grosvenor TP
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Oct; 75(10):719-26. PubMed ID: 9798211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer.
    Pickwell LD; Gilchrist JM; Hesler J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3419825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Near heterophoria with a description of the heterometer].
    Littan KE
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 May; 192(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 3404960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phoria measurements using chromatic targets.
    Strong G; Pace R
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Jun; 59(6):532-4. PubMed ID: 7102815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics and variability of vertical phoria adaptation in normal adults.
    Kono R; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H; Furuse T; Tanaka T
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1998; 42(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 9822963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does an iPad fixation disparity test give equivalent results to the Mallett near fixation disparity test?
    Parmar KR; Dickinson C; Evans BJW
    J Optom; 2019; 12(4):222-231. PubMed ID: 31501055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.