These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10647251)

  • 1. What's right to do? New Jersey malpractice cases reflect clinical quandaries.
    Weisfeld NE
    N J Med; 2000 Jan; 97(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 10647251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Regionalization in obstetrics from the forensic viewpoint].
    Roemer VM
    Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7959309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of expert reports from a general practice expert in disciplinary cases and malpractice claims against family practitioners (1994-2000): a lesson for clinical practice].
    de Melker RA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 May; 145(21):1019-23. PubMed ID: 11407279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Behavior in cases of medical damage].
    Ratzel R
    Gynakologe; 1989 Dec; 22(6):406-10. PubMed ID: 2533927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Algorhythm of making forensic medical expert examinations by medical documents in obstetric-gynecological practice].
    Beliaev LV; Nozdriakov KV
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2007; 50(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 17338336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The right course in obstetrics--what is "natural" and what is "right?"].
    Saling E
    Fortschr Med; 1984 Feb; 102(8):70-1. PubMed ID: 6745829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Complaints and claims about obstetric care; expert testimony from one expert reported over 10 years (1984-1995)].
    Treffers PE
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1996 Jan; 140(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 8618646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some placental considerations in alleged obstetrical and neonatology malpractice.
    Altshuler G
    Leg Med; 1993; ():27-47. PubMed ID: 8121230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Whom to believe? A review of recent malpractice cases.
    Weisfeld NE
    N J Med; 1998 Dec; 95(12):51-5. PubMed ID: 16013138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selected medical malpractice cases in New Jersey.
    Weisfeld NE
    N J Med; 1996 Sep; 93(9):57-62. PubMed ID: 8854686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What constitutes competence!
    Brenner LH
    Group Pract J; 1988; 37(1):11. PubMed ID: 10316230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How lawyers have invaded the delivery room.
    Huber PW
    Med Econ; 1992 Dec; 69(23):149, 153-7, 160 passim. PubMed ID: 10122761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Preventable medical treatment errors in gynecology and obstetrics. Conclusions of the Expert Committee for Medical Treatment Errors of the North-Rhine Medical Group].
    Fitting W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Jun; 56(6):M87-90. PubMed ID: 8766495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Analysis of expert reports from a general practice expert in disciplinary cases and malpractice claims against family practitioners (1994-2000): a lesson for clinical practice].
    Berend K
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Nov; 145(45):2195-6. PubMed ID: 11727623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [50 obstetric malpractice cases: difficult to draw limits, inconsistent decisions].
    Lindmark G
    Lakartidningen; 1992 Jan; 89(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 1734145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The problems in organizing forensic medical expertise in cases of professional law infringements by medical workers (exemplified by obstetrical-gynecological service)].
    Plaksin VO; Gurtovoĭ BL; Oboĭmakov VB
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1994; 37(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 8184455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reeves decision changes expert witness qualifications.
    Schulte DJ
    Mich Med; 2008; 107(3):7. PubMed ID: 18700394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ten-year experience in otolaryngology medical malpractice claims in New Jersey.
    Yeager HP; Kuehm SL
    N J Med; 1988 Oct; 85(10):819-23. PubMed ID: 3226630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Amended judgment of malpractice due to delayed expert testimony. Decision by the German Federal Court 22 November 2005].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2006 Jun; 131(23):1339-40. PubMed ID: 16761205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice in Turkey: incidence, impact, causes and prevention.
    Büken E; Ornek Büken N; Büken B
    J Clin Forensic Med; 2004 Oct; 11(5):233-47. PubMed ID: 15489176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.