BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10647546)

  • 1. Effect of push frequency on the economy of wheelchair racers.
    Goosey VL; Campbell IG; Fowler NE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Jan; 32(1):174-81. PubMed ID: 10647546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wheelchair propulsion: effects of experience and push strategy on efficiency and perceived exertion.
    Lenton JP; Fowler NE; van der Woude L; Goosey-Tolfrey VL
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2008 Oct; 33(5):870-9. PubMed ID: 18923561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of push frequency and strategy variations on economy and perceived exertion during wheelchair propulsion.
    Goosey-Tolfrey VL; Kirk JH
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2003 Sep; 90(1-2):154-8. PubMed ID: 14504947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of arm frequency during synchronous and asynchronous wheelchair propulsion on efficiency.
    Lenton JP; van der Woude L; Fowler N; Goosey-Tolfrey V
    Int J Sports Med; 2009 Apr; 30(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 19199211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hand-rim forces and gross mechanical efficiency at various frequencies of wheelchair propulsion.
    Lenton JP; van der Woude LH; Fowler NE; Nicholson G; Tolfrey K; Goosey-Tolfrey VL
    Int J Sports Med; 2013 Feb; 34(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 22918717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimum cycle frequencies in hand-rim wheelchair propulsion. Wheelchair propulsion technique.
    van der Woude LH; Veeger HE; Rozendal RH; Sargeant AJ
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1989; 58(6):625-32. PubMed ID: 2731532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hand-rim forces and gross mechanical efficiency in asynchronous and synchronous wheelchair propulsion: a comparison.
    Lenton JP; van der Woude L; Fowler N; Nicholson G; Tolfrey K; Goosey-Tolfrey V
    Int J Sports Med; 2014 Mar; 35(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 23945971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differentiated perceived exertion and self-regulated wheelchair exercise.
    Paulson TA; Bishop NC; Eston RG; Goosey-Tolfrey VL
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Nov; 94(11):2269-76. PubMed ID: 23562415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kinetic factors determining wheelchair propulsion in marathon racers with paraplegia.
    Okawa H; Tajima F; Makino K; Kawazu T; Mizushima T; Monji K; Ogata H
    Spinal Cord; 1999 Aug; 37(8):542-7. PubMed ID: 10455529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wheelchair users' perceived exertion during typical mobility activities.
    Qi L; Ferguson-Pell M; Salimi Z; Haennel R; Ramadi A
    Spinal Cord; 2015 Sep; 53(9):687-91. PubMed ID: 25777329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeated bouts of exercise alter the blood lactate-RPE relation.
    Weltman A; Weltman JY; Kanaley JA; Rogol AD; Veldhuis JD
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1998 Jul; 30(7):1113-7. PubMed ID: 9662681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantifying cardiorespiratory responses resulting from speed and slope increments during motorized treadmill propulsion among manual wheelchair users.
    Gauthier C; Grangeon M; Ananos L; Brosseau R; Gagnon DH
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Sep; 60(5):281-288. PubMed ID: 28410868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex differences in wheelchair propulsion biomechanics and mechanical efficiency in novice young able-bodied adults.
    Chaikhot D; Taylor MJD; Hettinga FJ
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2018 Jun; 18(5):650-658. PubMed ID: 29533156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propulsion technique and anaerobic work capacity in elite wheelchair athletes: cross-sectional analysis.
    van der Woude LH; Bakker WH; Elkhuizen JW; Veeger HE; Gwinn T
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1998; 77(3):222-34. PubMed ID: 9635557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physiological responses of wheelchair athletes at percentages of top speed.
    Campbell IG; Williams C; Lakomy HK
    Br J Sports Med; 1997 Mar; 31(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9132209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physiologic comparison of forward and reverse wheelchair propulsion.
    Salvi FJ; Hoffman MD; Sabharwal S; Clifford PS
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Jan; 79(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9440415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hand rim configuration: effects on physical strain and technique in unimpaired subjects?
    van der Woude LH; Formanoy M; de Groot S
    Med Eng Phys; 2003 Nov; 25(9):765-74. PubMed ID: 14519349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissimilar Physiological and Perceptual Responses Between Sprint Interval Training and High-Intensity Interval Training.
    Wood KM; Olive B; LaValle K; Thompson H; Greer K; Astorino TA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Jan; 30(1):244-50. PubMed ID: 26691413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of crank rate in hand cycling.
    Verellen J; Theisen D; Vanlandewijck Y
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Oct; 36(10):1826-31. PubMed ID: 15595307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical efficiency and propulsion technique after 7 weeks of low-intensity wheelchair training.
    de Groot S; de Bruin M; Noomen SP; van der Woude LH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):434-41. PubMed ID: 18077065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.